Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318332›Full record

ArticleScientific data2022

SkewDB, a comprehensive database of GC and 10 other skews for over 30,000 chromosomes and plasmids.

Bert Hubert

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A rapid test for protein-DNA interactions.Nucleic acids research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The genome ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Strand asymmetries across genomic processes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bert HubertAHU Holding Research, Nootdorp, Netherlands. bert@hubertnet.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-0670
Netherlands Leprosy Relief · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GC skew denotes the relative excess of G nucleotides over C nucleotides on the leading versus the lagging replication strand of eubacteria. While the effect is small, typically around 2.5%, it is robust and pervasive. GC skew and the analogous TA skew are a localized deviation from Chargaff's second parity rule, which states that G and C, and T and A occur with (mostly) equal frequency even within a strand. Different bacterial phyla show different kinds of skew, and differing relations between TA and GC skew. This article introduces an open access database ( https://skewdb.org ) of GC and 10 other skews for over 30,000 chromosomes and plasmids. Further details like codon bias, strand bias, strand lengths and taxonomic data are also included. The SkewDB can be used to generate or verify hypotheses. Since the origins of both the second parity rule and GC skew itself are not yet satisfactorily explained, such a database may enhance our understanding of prokaryotic DNA.

Indexed as

BacteriaChromosomesBase CompositionDatabases, GeneticNucleotidesPlasmidsNucleotides

Identifiers

PMID35318332
PMCPMC8941118
OpenAlexW4220882942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.