Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318256›Full record

SynthesisLupus science & medicine2022

Hydroxychloroquine in the pregnancies of women with lupus: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Megan E B Clowse, Amanda M Eudy, Stephen Balevic, Gillian Sanders-Schmidler, Andrzej Kosinski, Rebecca Fischer-Betz, Dafna D Gladman, Yair Molad, Cecilia Nalli, Abir Mokbel and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lupus science & medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hydroxychloroquine as an Adjunct Therapy for Diabetes in Pregnancy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Megan E B ClowseMedicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA megan.clowse@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8579-3470
Amanda M EudyMedicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Stephen BalevicRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4016-1680
Gillian Sanders-SchmidlerDuke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Andrzej KosinskiBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Rebecca Fischer-BetzRheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Dafna D GladmanTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yair MoladRheumtology, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Cecilia NalliRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Abir MokbelMedicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Angela TincaniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Murray UrowitzCenter for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Lupus Clinic, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7506-9166
Caroline BayBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Megan van NoordLibrary, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Michelle PetriRheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1441-5373
Duke University · USUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Toronto · CABaylor College of Medicine · USCairo University · EGHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEJohns Hopkins University · USRabin Medical Center · ILUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002554 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SVETKEY, LAURA P · 2018 to 2022
$8.2M
Hopkins Lupus CohortR01AR069572 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PETRI, MICHELLE A · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
Optimizing Lupus Management in PregnancyK18HS023443 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CLOWSE, MEGAN E.B. · 2015 to 2016
$423k
AHRQ HHS K18 HS023443NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002554NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMultiple guidelines recommend continuing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for SLE during pregnancy based on observational data. The goal of this individual patient data meta-analysis was to identify the potential benefits and harms of HCQ use within lupus pregnancies.

methodsEligible studies included prospectively collected pregnancies in women with lupus. After a systematic literature search, seven datasets meeting inclusion criteria were obtained. Pregnancy outcomes and lupus activity were compared for pregnancies with a visit in the first trimester in women who did or did not take HCQ throughout pregnancy. Birth defects were not systematically collected. This analysis was conducted in each dataset, and results were aggregated to provide a pooled OR.

resultsSeven cohorts provided 938 pregnancies in 804 women. After selecting one pregnancy per patient with a first trimester visit, 668 pregnancies were included; 63% took HCQ throughout pregnancy. Compared with pregnancies without HCQ, those with HCQ had lower odds of highly active lupus, but did not have different odds of fetal loss, preterm delivery or pre-eclampsia. Among women with low lupus activity, HCQ reduced the odds of preterm delivery.

conclusionsThis large study of prospectively-collected lupus pregnancies demonstrates a decrease in lupus activity among woman who continue HCQ through pregnancy and no harm to pregnancy outcomes. Like all studies of HCQ in lupus pregnancy, this study is confounded by indication and non-adherence. As this study confirms the safety of HCQ and diminished SLE activity with use, it is consistent with current recommendations to continue HCQ throughout pregnancy.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsHydroxychloroquineEpidemiologyHealth services researchLupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Identifiers

PMID35318256
PMCPMC8935175
OpenAlexW4220721988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.