Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318254›Full record

ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2022

Invasive coronary physiology in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a consensus document from the coronary microvascular dysfunction workstream of the British Heart Foundation/National Institute for Health Research Partnership.

Divaka Perera, Colin Berry, Stephen P Hoole, Aish Sinha, Haseeb Rahman, Paul D Morris, Rajesh K Kharbanda, Ricardo Petraco, Keith Channon, UK Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Working Group

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. ANOCA, INOCA, MINOCA: The New Frontier of Coronary Syndromes.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Divaka PereraBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK divaka.perera@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6362-1291
Colin BerryBHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-8636
Stephen P HooleNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Aish SinhaBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Haseeb RahmanBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Paul D MorrisInfection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3965-121X
Rajesh K KharbandaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5356-2395
Ricardo PetracoNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Keith ChannonDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-4342
UK Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Working Group

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/16/1/32013British Heart Foundation FS/16/49/32320British Heart Foundation SP/17/16/33519Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/T029390/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 214567/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly half of all patients with angina have non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA); this is an umbrella term comprising heterogeneous vascular disorders, each with disparate pathophysiology and prognosis. Approximately two-thirds of patients with ANOCA have coronary microvascular disease (CMD). CMD can be secondary to architectural changes within the microcirculation or secondary to vasomotor dysfunction. An inability of the coronary vasculature to augment blood flow in response to heightened myocardial demand is defined as an impaired coronary flow reserve (CFR), which can be measured non-invasively, using imaging, or invasively during cardiac catheterisation. Impaired CFR is associated with myocardial ischaemia and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.The CMD workstream is part of the cardiovascular partnership between the British Heart Foundation and The National Institute for Health Research in the UK and comprises specialist cardiac centres with expertise in coronary physiology assessment. This document outlines the two main modalities (thermodilution and Doppler techniques) for estimation of coronary flow, vasomotor testing using acetylcholine, and outlines a standard operating procedure that could be considered for adoption by national networks. Accurate and timely disease characterisation of patients with ANOCA will enable clinicians to tailor therapy according to their patients' coronary physiology. This has been shown to improve patients' quality of life and may lead to improved cardiovascular outcomes in the long term.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMicrovascular AnginaMyocardial IschemiaCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationCoronary VesselsHumansMicrocirculationQuality of LifeAngina PectorisChest PainCoronary AngiographyMicrovascular Angina

Identifiers

PMID35318254
PMCPMC9811089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.