Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318213›Full record

SynthesisBMJ supportive & palliative care2023

Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance-systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Sophie Mulcahy Symmons, Karen Ryan, Samar M Aoun, Lucy E Selman, Andrew Neil Davies, Nicola Cornally, John Lombard, Regina McQuilllan, Suzanne Guerin, Norma O'Leary and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Continuous sedation in adolescent and young adult cancer patients under home-based end-of-life care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Sophie Mulcahy SymmonsDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0749-6582
Karen RyanSt Francis Hospice Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Samar M AounPalliative Care Unit, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lucy E SelmanPalliative and End of Life Care Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5747-2699
Andrew Neil DaviesAcademic Department of Palliative Medicine, Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4207-4799
Nicola CornallySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
John LombardSchool of Law, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2201-5441
Regina McQuilllanSt Francis Hospice Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Suzanne GuerinSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6744-7590
Norma O'LearyOur Lady's Hospice and Care Services, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael ConnollySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Mary RabbitteAll Ireland Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care, Dublin, Ireland.
David MocklerJohn Stearne Medical Library, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Geraldine FoleyDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland foleyg3@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7952-9246
University College Dublin · IETrinity College Dublin · IEAll Ireland Institute for Hospice and Palliative Care · IEBeaumont Hospital · IELa Trobe University · AUOur Lady's Hospital · IEUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecision-making in palliative care usually involves both patients and family caregivers. However, how concordance and discordance in decision-making manifest and function between patients and family caregivers in palliative care is not well understood.

objectivesTo identify key factors and/or processes which underpin concordance and/or discordance between patients and family caregivers with respect to their preferences for and decisions about palliative care; and ascertain how patients and family caregivers manage discordance in decision-making in palliative care.

methodsA systematic review and narrative synthesis of original studies published in full between January 2000 and June 2021 was conducted using the following databases: Embase; Medline; CINAHL; AMED; Web of Science; PsycINFO; PsycARTICLES; and Social Sciences Full Text.

resultsAfter full-text review, 39 studies were included in the synthesis. Studies focused primarily on end-of-life care and on patient and family caregiver preferences for patient care. We found that discordance between patients and family caregivers in palliative care can manifest in relational conflict and can result from a lack of awareness of and communication about each other's preferences for care. Patients' advancing illness and impending death together with open dialogue about future care including advance care planning can foster consensus between patients and family caregivers.

conclusionsPatients and family caregivers in palliative care can accommodate each other's preferences for care. Further research is needed to fully understand how patients and family caregivers move towards consensus in the context of advancing illness.

Indexed as

Hospice CareTerminal CareCaregiversDecision MakingHumansPalliative Carecommunicationfamily managementmethodological researchsupportive caresymptoms and symptom managementterminal care

Identifiers

PMID35318213
PMCPMC10804031
OpenAlexW4220864832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.