ArticleThe Science of the total environment2022
Direct observations of CO
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term investigation of methane and carbon dioxide emissions in two Italian landfills.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Satellite reveals a steep decline in China's COScience advances · 2023Article
- The impact of financial tools in environmental degradation management: the relationship between CoEnvironment, development and sustainability · 2023Article
- Air pollution and mobility patterns in two Ugandan cities during COVID-19 mobility restrictions suggest the validity of air quality data as a measure for human mobility.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023Article
- COVID-19 pandemic underscores role of green space in urban carbon dynamics.The Science of the total environment · 2023Article
- How Does Health Uncertainty Impact Greenhouse Gas Emissions in European Union Economies? A Blessing in Disguise.International journal of environmental research · 2023Article
- Short run "rebound effect" of COVID on the transport carbon footprint.Cities (London, England) · 2022Article
- Impact of the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown on NOAtmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994) · 2022Article
- Reductions in California's Urban Fossil Fuel COAGU advances · 2022Article
- Significant reduction of ultrafine particle emission fluxes to the urban atmosphere during the COVID-19 lockdown.The Science of the total environment · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The measures taken to contain the spread of COVID-19 in 2020 included restrictions of people's mobility and reductions in economic activities. These drastic changes in daily life, enforced through national lockdowns, led to abrupt reductions of anthropogenic CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.