Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35317949›Full record

ReviewUltrasound in medicine & biology2022

Tele-ultrasound in the Era of COVID-19: A Practical Guide.

Christopher Uschnig, Florian Recker, Michael Blaivas, Yi Dong, Christoph F Dietrich

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Christopher UschnigDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clinics Beau-Site, Salem and Permanence, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: c.f.dietrich@googlemail.com.
Florian ReckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus, Germany.
Michael BlaivasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St. Francis Hospital, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbus, Georgia, USA.
Yi DongDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Christoph F DietrichDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clinics Beau-Site, Salem and Permanence, Bern, Switzerland.
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site · CHSt. Francis Hospital · USUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine has evolved over the past 50 years, with video consultations and telehealth (TH) mobile apps that are now widely used to support care in the management of chronic conditions, but are infrequently used in acute conditions such as emergencies. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, demand is growing for video consultations as they minimize health provider-patient interactions and thereby the risk of infection. Advanced applications such as tele-ultrasound (TUS) have not yet gained a foothold despite their achieving technical maturity and the availability of software from numerous companies for TUS for their respective portable ultrasound devices. However, ultrasound is indispensable for triage in emergencies and also offers distinct advantages in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia for certain patient populations such as pregnant women, children and immobilized patients. Additionally, recent work suggests lung ultrasound can accurately risk stratify patients for likely infection when immediate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing is not available and has prognostic utility for positive patients with respect to the need for admission and intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. Though currently underutilized, a wider implementation of TUS in TH applications and processes may be an important stepping-stone for telemedicine. The addition of ultrasound to TH may allow it to cross the barrier from being an application used mainly for primary care and chronic conditions to an indispensable tool used in emergency care, disaster situations, remote areas and low-income countries where it is difficult to obtain high-quality diagnostic imaging. The objective of this review was to provide an overview of the current state of telemedicine, insights into current and future use scenarios, its practical application as well as current TUS uses and their potential value with an overview of currently available portable and handheld ultrasound devices. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic we point out an unmet need and use case of TUS as a supportive tool for health care providers and organizations in the management of affected patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineChildEmergenciesFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancyUltrasonographyCOVID-19Handheld ultrasound deviceLung ultrasoundTelemedicineTele-ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35317949
PMCPMC8743597
OpenAlexW4205364895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.