Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35317870›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of laryngology and otology2023

Can probiotic gargles reduce post-tonsillectomy morbidity in adult patients? A pilot, triple-blind, randomised, controlled trial and feasibility study.

M V Nasserallah, N M de Silva, V Tobin, W M Rozen, D J Hunter-Smith

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of laryngology and otology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M V NasserallahDepartment of ENT Surgery, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3618-2785
N M de SilvaDepartment of ENT Surgery, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Australia.
V TobinDepartment of Surgery, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Australia.
W M RozenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Australia.
D J Hunter-SmithDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to determine the efficacy of probiotic gargles compared with placebo gargles on reducing post-tonsillectomy morbidity in adults.

methodThis was a triple-blind, randomised, controlled trial and feasibility study. Thirty adults underwent elective tonsillectomy and were randomly assigned to receive either probiotic or placebo gargles for 14 days after surgery. Daily pain scores and requirement of analgesia were measured for 14 days post-operatively. Secondary outcomes assessed probiotic safety and tolerability and the feasibility of the trial.

resultsThe probiotic group experienced less pain at rest on day 2. However, the amount of oxycodone (5 mg) tablets used was greater in the probiotic group compared with placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of adverse effects between both groups. This trial was feasible.

conclusionThis pilot study suggested that probiotic gargles do not reduce post-tonsillectomy pain or bleeding, highlighting the importance of pilot and feasibility studies in clinical research.

Indexed as

ProbioticsTonsillectomyAdultDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesHumansPilot ProjectsPostoperative PainTreatment OutcomeAnalgesiaDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesHemorrhageMicrobiotaPilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsProbioticsRandomized Controlled TrialTonsillectomy

Identifiers

PMID35317870
PMCPMC9975764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.