Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35317793›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Accurate classification of carotid endarterectomy indication using physician claims and hospital discharge data.

Stephen van Gaal, Arshia Alimohammadi, Amy Y X Yu, Mohammad Ehsanul Karim, Wei Zhang, Jason M Sutherland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen van GaalFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 8161-2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada. stephen.vangaal@vch.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0732-4393
Arshia AlimohammadiFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 8161-2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada.
Amy Y X YuDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mohammad Ehsanul KarimSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0346-2871
Wei ZhangSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7988-1979
Jason M SutherlandCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1857-2432
University of British Columbia · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeStudies of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) require stratification by symptomatic vs asymptomatic status because of marked differences in benefits and harms. In administrative datasets, this classification has been done using hospital discharge diagnosis codes of uncertain accuracy. This study aims to develop and evaluate algorithms for classifying symptomatic status using hospital discharge and physician claims data.

methodsA single center's administrative database was used to assemble a retrospective cohort of participants with CEA. Symptomatic status was ascertained by chart review prior to linkage with physician claims and hospital discharge data. Accuracy of rule-based classification by discharge diagnosis codes was measured by sensitivity and specificity. Elastic net logistic regression and random forest models combining physician claims and discharge data were generated from the training set and assessed in a test set of final year participants. Models were compared to rule-based classification using sensitivity at fixed specificity.

resultsWe identified 971 participants undergoing CEA at the Vancouver General Hospital (Vancouver, Canada) between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016. Of these, 729 met inclusion/exclusion criteria (n = 615 training, n = 114 test). Classification of symptomatic status using hospital discharge diagnosis codes was 32.8% (95% CI 29-37%) sensitive and 98.6% specific (96-100%). At matched 98.6% specificity, models that incorporated physician claims data were significantly more sensitive: elastic net 69.4% (59-82%) and random forest 78.8% (69-88%).

conclusionDischarge diagnoses were specific but insensitive for the classification of CEA symptomatic status. Elastic net and random forest machine learning algorithms that included physician claims data were sensitive and specific, and are likely an improvement over current state of classification by discharge diagnosis alone.

Indexed as

Endarterectomy, CarotidPhysiciansHospitalsHumansPatient DischargeRetrospective StudiesAdministrative dataCarotid endarterectomyMachine learningStatistical model

Identifiers

PMID35317793
PMCPMC8941812
OpenAlexW4221015074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.