Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35317734›Full record

Trial reportBMC primary care2022

Direct-to-consumer strategies to promote deprescribing in primary care: a pilot study.

Amy M Linsky, Nancy R Kressin, Kelly Stolzmann, Jacquelyn Pendergast, Amy K Rosen, Barbara G Bokhour, Steven R Simon

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current Landscape and Future Directions of Deprescribing and Polypharmacy Practices in Jordan.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amy M LinskySection of General Internal Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. amy.linsky@va.gov.
Nancy R KressinSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Kelly StolzmannCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System and VA Bedford Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacquelyn PendergastCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System and VA Bedford Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Amy K RosenCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System and VA Bedford Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Barbara G BokhourCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System and VA Bedford Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Steven R SimonCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
VA Boston Healthcare System · USBoston University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeprescribing, or the intentional discontinuation or dose-reduction of medications, is an approach to reduce harms associated with inappropriate medication use. We sought to determine how direct-to-patient educational materials impacted patient-provider discussion about and deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medications.

methodsWe conducted a pre-post pilot trial, using an historical control group, at an urban VA medical center. We included patients in one of two cohorts: 1) chronic proton pump inhibitor users (PPI), defined as use of any dose for 90 consecutive days, or 2) patients at hypoglycemia risk, defined by diabetes diagnosis; prescription for insulin or sulfonylurea; hemoglobin A1c < 7%; and age ≥ 65 years, renal insufficiency, or cognitive impairment. The intervention consisted of mailing medication-specific patient-centered EMPOWER (Eliminating Medications Through Patient Ownership of End Results) brochures, adapted to a Veteran patient population, two weeks prior to scheduled primary care appointments. Our primary outcome - deprescribing - was defined as clinical documentation of target medication discontinuation or dose-reduction. Our secondary outcome was documentation of a discussion about the target medication (yes/possible vs. no/absent). Covariates included age, sex, race, specified comorbidities, medications, and utilization. We used chi-square tests to examine the association of receiving brochures with each outcome.

resultsThe 348 subjects (253 intervention, 95 historical control) were primarily age ≥ 65 years, white, and male. Compared to control subjects, intervention subjects were more likely to have deprescribing (36 [14.2%] vs. 4 [4.2%], p = 0.009) and discussions about the target medication (31 [12.3%] vs. 1 [1.1%], p = 0.001).

conclusionsTargeted mailings of EMPOWER brochures temporally linked to a scheduled visit in primary care clinics are a low-cost, low-technology method associated with increases in both deprescribing and documentation of patient-provider medication discussions in a Veteran population. Leveraging the potential for patients to initiate deprescribing discussions within clinical encounters is a promising strategy to reduce drug burden and decrease adverse drug effects and harms.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsAgedFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListPrimary Health CareProton Pump InhibitorsProton Pump InhibitorsDecision MakingDeprescriptionsInappropriate PrescribingPatient ParticipationShared

Identifiers

PMID35317734
PMCPMC8939089
OpenAlexW4221058211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.