Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35317722›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Lightweight ProteinUnet2 network for protein secondary structure prediction: a step towards proper evaluation.

Katarzyna Stapor, Krzysztof Kotowski, Tomasz Smolarczyk, Irena Roterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning for protein secondary structure prediction: Pre and post-AlphaFold.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katarzyna Stapor *Department of Applied Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland. Katarzyna.Stapor@polsl.pl.
Krzysztof Kotowski *Department of Applied Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.
Tomasz SmolarczykDepartment of Applied Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.
Irena RotermanDepartment of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Medyczna 7, 30-688, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

Silesian University of Technology 02/100/BK_21/0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prediction of protein secondary structures is a crucial and significant step for ab initio tertiary structure prediction which delivers the information about proteins activity and functions. As the experimental methods are expensive and sometimes impossible, many SS predictors, mainly based on different machine learning methods have been proposed for many years. Currently, most of the top methods use evolutionary-based input features produced by PSSM and HHblits software, although quite recently the embeddings-the new description of protein sequences generated by language models (LM) have appeared that could be leveraged as input features. Apart from input features calculation, the top models usually need extensive computational resources for training and prediction and are barely possible to run on a regular PC. SS prediction as the imbalanced classification problem should not be judged by the commonly used Q3/Q8 metrics. Moreover, as the benchmark datasets are not random samples, the classical statistical null hypothesis testing based on the Neyman-Pearson approach is not appropriate.

resultsWe present a lightweight deep network ProteinUnet2 for SS prediction which is based on U-Net convolutional architecture and evolutionary-based input features (from PSSM and HHblits) as well as SPOT-Contact features. Through an extensive evaluation study, we report the performance of ProteinUnet2 in comparison with top SS prediction methods based on evolutionary information (SAINT and SPOT-1D). We also propose a new statistical methodology for prediction performance assessment based on the significance from Fisher-Pitman permutation tests accompanied by practical significance measured by Cohen's effect size.

conclusionsOur results suggest that ProteinUnet2 architecture has much shorter training and inference times while maintaining results similar to SAINT and SPOT-1D predictors. Taking into account the relatively long times of calculating evolutionary-based features (from PSSM in particular), it would be worth conducting the predictive ability tests on embeddings as input features in the future. We strongly believe that our proposed here statistical methodology for the evaluation of SS prediction results will be adopted and used (and even expanded) by the research community.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsAmino Acid SequenceDatabases, ProteinProtein Structure, SecondaryProteinsDeep learningHHblitsProtein secondary structure predictionPSSMU-Net

Identifiers

PMID35317722
PMCPMC8939211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.