Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35317543›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2022

Impact of parenchyma-preserving surgical methods on treating patients with solid pseudopapillary neoplasms: A retrospective study with a large sample size.

Yu-Qiong Li, Shu-Bo Pan, Shu-Shu Yan, Zhen-Dong Jin, Hao-Jie Huang, Li-Qi Sun

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Rare tumours of the pancreas: monocentric study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Qiong LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China.
Shu-Bo PanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China.
Shu-Shu YanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China.
Zhen-Dong JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China.
Hao-Jie HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China.
Li-Qi SunDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China.
Second Military Medical University · CNChanghai Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSolid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare neoplasm that mainly affects young women.

aimTo evaluate the impact of parenchyma-preserving surgical methods (PPMs, including enucleation and central pancreatectomy) in the treatment of SPN patients.

methodsFrom 2013 to 2019, patients who underwent pancreatectomy for SPNs were retrospectively reviewed. The baseline characteristics, intraoperative index, pathological outcomes, short-term complications and long-term follow-up data were compared between the PPM group and the conventional method (CM) group.

resultsIn total, 166 patients were included in this study. Of them, 33 patients (19.9%) underwent PPM. Most of the tumors (104/166, 62.7%) were found accidentally. Comparing the parameters between groups, the hospital stay d (12.35

conclusionPPM for SPN appears to be feasible and safe for preserving the exocrine function of the pancreas.

Indexed as

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiencyParenchyma-preserving methodSolid pseudopapillary neoplasmSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID35317543
PMCPMC8908337
OpenAlexW4213332876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.