ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022
Very poor practices regarding breast cancer screening among Sudanese female workers at a secondary-level hospital: a cross-sectional study.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic delay among symptomatic breast cancer patients: a study in Sudanese women.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
- Perceived barriers and factors influencing uptake of breast cancer screening among women: a population-based cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Knowledge of risk factors and early detection methods toward breast cancer among healthcare workers in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Knowledge of breast cancer among patients undergoing breast cancer treatment at a Tertiary Hospital in Ghana.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- Women's cancers in Sudan with a focus on cervical cancer: turmoil, geopolitics and opportunities.Ecancermedicalscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: breast cancer (BC) mortality and morbidity burden in African countries is higher compared to western countries due to late diagnosis produced by deficient screening. We aimed to assess the level of knowledge, attitude and practice regarding breast cancer screening among Sudanese female workers at a secondary-level hospital. Methods: this is a cross-sectional study carried out at the largest governmental hospital of Ad-Damazin City (capital of Blue Nile State, south-eastern Sudan) in 2018. It surveyed female healthcare providers "group A" compared to the non-medical female staff at the same hospital "group B" to assess their awareness, beliefs and behavior concerning Breast Cancer Screening (BCS). Chi-squared and Student t-tests were used for analysis with a significant p value of <0.05. Results: participants were 110, included 78 (70.9%), ("group A") and 32 (29.1%) ("group B") women. Good overall knowledge score (47.4%) vs (43.8%), for "group A" and "group B", respectively, p=0.000. Positive attitude was scored by 63 (80.8%) vs. 23 (71.9%) participants in "group A" and "group B" respectively, p= 0.305. Obvious denial trend regarding susceptibility to this disease was noted in both groups. BCS practices were seriously unsatisfactory in both groups. As "group A" vs "group B" regarding breast self-examination, n=13 (16.7%) vs n=10 (31.3%); clinical breast examination n=4 (5.1%) vs n=4 (12.5%) and mammography was not performed by any woman in both groups. Conclusion: the modest knowledge and poor BCS practices of our study groups strongly recommends appropriate official and educational actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.