ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2022
Development and testing of a mobile application for periodontal diagnosis.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the Performance and Implementation of the 2018 Classification of Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Survey.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Pooled it
- The PocketPerio application significantly increases the accuracy of diagnosing periodontal conditions in didactic and chairside settings.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Clinical validation of a web-based decision support system for periodontal diagnosis, risk assessment, and recall planning: A multicenter study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The new classification of periodontal diseases introduced a new set of rules for periodontal diagnosis. The objective of this study was to develop and test the implementation of a mobile device application for periodontal diagnosis. Material and Methods: An integral algorithm that included periodontal health / related conditions and periodontitis was developed based on the classification of periodontal diseases of 2018. A mobile application for Android implementing the algorithm was developed using the framework MIT App Inventor. Once the app was debugged for glitches and performance of the algorithm, it was tested with 20 voluntary dental students, postgraduate students of periodontology, and professors in an academic setting. Participants were asked to determine the diagnosis of 10 predetermined clinical cases using two strategies: diagnosis based on knowledge and with the PerioSmart app. The results were tabulated, and the concordance rate was calculated. Results: In general, the use of the PerioSmart application had a better concordance rate than diagnosis based on knowledge. In particular, the mobile app was better in determining the type of diagnosis, stage/grade of periodontitis, and with better efficiency. Conclusions: The mobile device application demonstrated efficiency and good concordance rate and therefore can improve the periodontal diagnosis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.