Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35317287›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021

Trilateral Attention Network for Real-Time Cardiac Region Segmentation.

Ghada Zamzmi, Sivaramakrishnan Rajaraman, Vandana Sachdev, Sameer Antani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ghada ZamzmiNational Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4723-5539
Sivaramakrishnan RajaramanNational Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Vandana SachdevNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Sameer AntaniNational Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate segmentation of cardiac images into anatomically meaningful regions is critical for the extraction of quantitative cardiac indices. The common pipeline for segmentation comprises regions of interest (ROIs) localization and segmentation stages that are independent of each other and typically performed using separate models. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end network, called Trilateral Attention Network (TaNet), for real-time region localization and segmentation. TaNet has a module for ROIs localization and three segmentation pathways: spatial pathway, handcrafted pathway, and context pathway. The localization module focuses segmentation attention on the desired region while learning the context relationship between different regions in the image. The localized regions are then sent to the three pathways for segmentation. The spatial pathway, which has regular convolutional kernels, is used to extract deep features at different levels of abstraction. The handcrafted pathway, which has hand-designed convolutional kernels, is used to extract a unique set of features complementary to the deep features. Finally, the context (or global) pathway is used to enlarge the receptive field. By jointly training TaNet for localization and segmentation, TaNet achieved superior performance, in terms of accuracy and speed, when evaluated on two echocardiography datasets for cardiac region segmentation.

Indexed as

attentionechocardiographyfusionlocalizationSemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID35317287
PMCPMC8936584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.