Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35317252›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2022

Functional and radiological outcomes of different pin configuration for displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture: A retrospective cohort study.

Ahmad M Radaideh, Mohammad Rusan, Omar Obeidat, Jowan Al-Nusair, Iyad S Albustami, Ziyad M Mohaidat, Abdulkarim W Sunallah

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Reconstruction of medial and lateral column periosteal hinge using Kirschner wire to assist in closed reduction of multi-directional unstable humeral supracondylar fractures in children].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmad M RadaidehDepartment of Special Surgery, Orthopaedic Division, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan. ahmadmr1970@yahoo.com.
Mohammad RusanDepartment of Special Surgery, Orthopaedic Division, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Omar ObeidatSchool of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Jowan Al-NusairSchool of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Iyad S AlbustamiSchool of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Ziyad M MohaidatDepartment of Special Surgery, Orthopaedic Division, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Abdulkarim W SunallahDepartment of Special Surgery, Orthopaedic Division, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe most widely accepted treatment for pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture is closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). However, there is debate regarding the technique that is utilized, whether crossed or lateral pinning, and the number of pins used.

aimTo compare the functional and radiological outcomes of lateral and cross pinning in the management of humeral supracondylar fracture.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 101 patients who were surgically managed by either one of the CRPP techniques from 2015 to 2019. Several clinical parameters were taken into account, including pre- and post-intervention Baumann angle, as well as scores for pain, range of motion, function, and stability. Statistical analysis was performed to study the outcomes of the utilized techniques.

resultsAmongst our study sample, which included 63 males and 38 females with a mean age of 5.87 years, about one-third of the patients underwent crossed pinning fixation configuration and the remaining two-thirds were managed by lateral pinning configuration. Similar results were obtained in the two groups with no statistical difference regarding Mayo elbow performance scores (MEPS) and Baumann angle. The mean MEPS in the lateral and crossed pinning groups were 93.68 + 8.59 and 93.62 + 9.05, respectively. The mean Baumann angle was 72.5° + 6.46 in the lateral group and 72.3° + 4.70 in the crossed-pinning group (

conclusionBoth lateral pinning and crossed pinning fixation configuration for displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures provide similar functional and radiological outcomes.

Indexed as

FunctionalGartlandPinningRadiologicalSupracondylar fracture

Identifiers

PMID35317252
PMCPMC8935329
OpenAlexW4221108174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.