ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022
Median arcuate ligamentum syndrome: Four case reports.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome Could Be Re-termed as a Nutcracker Celiac Ganglion Abdominal Pain Syndrome.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedian arcuate ligamentum syndrome (MALS) is a disease entity with unclear pathogenesis. If it is not considered in advance, the clinical diagnosis of the disease is very difficult because patients complain of digestive discomfort including pain. However, this characteristic is not specific to MALS. There have been no studies to assist in making a quick diagnosis. The aim of this case series was to recognize that MALS must be considered as a differential factor in the cause of abdominal pain. CASE SUMMARY: We described cases in which four patients complained of abdominal pain over a long period but in whom a diagnosis of MALS could not be made. If the gastroenterologist does not take into account abdominal pain in advance, the patient is considered an asymptomatic gallstone patient and has their gallbladder removed despite imaging evaluation. The patient may also be considered a psychiatric patient and may be administered psychiatric drugs over a long period. In all four cases in this report, the patients experienced abdominal pain. In three cases, the diagnosis was possible by the clinician's judgment considering both clinical symptoms and imaging techniques shortly after the onset of symptoms. However, in one case that lasted over 20 years, a clear diagnosis was not possible. Even after complaining of colicky pain and performing a cholecystectomy, the diagnosis was made only after the symptoms persisted. In all four cases, the symptoms were relieved by neuromodulators.
conclusionMALS is a rare disease and it is easy to miss because it is not malignant, but patients can suffer from pain over a long period. For the accurate diagnosis of a patient complaining of abdominal pain, the diagnosis must be differentiated. In addition, as there are asymptomatic patients, patients who need treatment should be carefully selected, and improvement with medical treatment can be expected. Large-scale studies are also needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.