ArticleEuropean food research and technology = Zeitschrift fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung. A2022
Seafood alternatives: assessing the nutritional profile of products sold in the global market.
Article in European food research and technology = Zeitschrift fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using commercial dataset for extracting information on nutrition composition for policy evaluation purposes.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- Bioactive Compounds in Seafood: Implications for Health and Nutrition.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Alternative Protein-Based Meat and Fish Analogs by Conventional and Novel Processing Technologies: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nutritional Quality of Plant-Based Fish and Seafood Analogs: A Study of the Italian Market.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparing Nutrient Profiles of Meat and Fish with Plant-Based Alternatives: Analysis of Nutrients, Ingredients, and Fortification Patterns.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Current challenges of alternative proteins as future foods.NPJ science of food · 2024Review
- Plant-based seafood alternatives: Current insights on the nutrition, protein-flavour interactions, and the processing of these foods.Current research in food science · 2024Review
- Impact of Sel-PlexOpen veterinary journal · 2024Article
- Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Orange-Footed Sea Cucumber (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Developments in Plant Proteins Production for Meat and Fish Analogues.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Nutritional Profile of Commercialized Plant-Based Meat: An Integrative Review with a Systematic Approach.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Nutritional Facts and Health/Nutrition Claims of Commercial Plant-Based Infant Foods: Where Do We Stand?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global market for seafood alternatives is witnessing an exponential growth. Nevertheless, the nutritional quality of such products is scarcely studied. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate, for the first time, the nutritional quality of seafood alternatives launched in the global market from 2002 to 2021 and to compare them with the conventional seafood products. Using the Mintel Global New Products Database, the nutritional information of seafood alternatives (i.e., tuna, shrimps, calamari, fish fingers, fish sticks, salmon, caviar, and fillet) was retrieved, and compared with conventional products. A total of 149 seafood alternatives were identified, of which 83 items had complete mandatory nutritional labeling. Conventional products ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00217-022-04004-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.