ArticleCureus2022
COVID-19 and Vaccine Hesitancy: Individual Determinants Among Saudis in Asir Region.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Hesitancy toward vaccination against COVID-19: A scoping review of prevalence and associated factors in the Arab world.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance among the public in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: A review of the literature.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious and quickly spreading disease, especially if associated with poor awareness and unwanted behavioral practices. Unvaccinated people are at high risk of infection, mortality, and morbidity. Practices and intent toward the COVID-19 vaccine are mainly influenced by the perception of vaccine safety. This study aimed to assess the perception, practices, intent, and challenges toward the COVID-19 vaccine in Asir region, Saudi Arabia. Methodology A quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted among the available population in Asir region, southwest of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from participants using a semi-structured electronic questionnaire. The questionnaire included sections on participants' socio-demographic data and their family and personal history of COVID-19 infection. Additionally, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on their daily life were assessed. The second section of the questionnaire included knowledge questions regarding the COVID-19 vaccine with only one correct answer for each question. The last section covered participants' attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine and their intent to take the vaccine with their previous vaccination practice. Results A total of 756 participants who met the inclusion criteria participated in the study. Participants' ages ranged from 18 to 65 years, with a mean age of 22.6 ± 12.8 years. A total of 518 respondents were females. Regarding the level of education, 72.2% were university graduates or postgraduates, and 195 (25.8%) were in high school. Regarding the overall knowledge level toward the COVID-19 vaccine among study participants, 420 (55.6%) participants had good knowledge regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. In total, 158 (20.9%) participants were of the view that the COVID-19 vaccine is risky. Approximately 26.9% of the participants were told by their doctor that vaccination is necessary, and 49.3% thought that they need more information about the COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusions This study revealed that public awareness regarding the COVID-19 vaccine was satisfactory, especially concerning its benefit in reducing infection and associated complications; however, poor awareness was reported regarding their perception of the pandemic and COVID-19 vaccine definition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.