ArticleCureus2022
Forensic Microbiological Analysis of Soil and the Physical Evidence Buried in Soil Obtained from Several Towns in Istanbul.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of soil bacterial and fungal communities at a small scale.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The identification of bacterial species in the soil can be used for the differentiation of soil samples and physical evidence. This study aims to evaluate the importance of identifying microorganisms in the soil for forensic sciences. The study covered 20 regions identified and marked outside the settlement areas within the boundaries of Istanbul. Methodology Big and wide soil and forest areas were preferred. Four types of physical evidence samples were collected from the identified areas at the end of the first, second, and third months and then analyzed. The collected samples were physically embedded in the soil. In this study, 10 g of soil sample and four pieces of physical evidence (fabric, rubber, metal, and wood), sized 5 × 5 cm and buried 20-30 cm deep in the soil, contaminated with soil were collected for analysis and stored in sterile conditions. The microbiological identification analyses were conducted at the end of the predefined period and in the predefined order using first phenotypic (e.g., microscopic and macroscopic), followed by culture methods using advanced diagnostic analyses, such as API and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Results In the soil samples and the physical evidence samples collected, 83% bacteria and 17% fungus were identified. A database was set up for the study findings. Conclusions The presence of microorganisms in the soil and physical evidence samples contaminated with soil, which is crucial in the evaluation of criminal cases, was determined using microbiological analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.