Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35316965›Full record

ArticleRespiratory medicine case reports2022

Clinical outcome of bronchoalveolar lavaged COVID ARDS patients.

Zablon Mesfin Anbessie, Dawit Kebede Huluka, Zelalem Abdisa Kenea

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory medicine case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zablon Mesfin AnbessieBethzatha General Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dawit Kebede HulukaCollege of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Zelalem Abdisa KeneaBethzatha General Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tikur Anbessa Hospital · ETAddis Ababa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: One of the biggest pandemics of the human race, Coronavirus disease, has reported mortality rates as high as 80% for critically ill patients. It has killed more than 3.9 million people worldwide with no strongly proven management options to decrease its mortality. One of the options gaining interest is fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage. Our study was conducted to assess the clinical outcome of intubated Coronavirus disease patients that had a fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage done. Methods and materials: A consecutive prospective case series of intubated patients with critical Coronavirus disease pneumonia were conducted at Bethzatha general hospital from April 20, 2021, to July 30, 2021 GC. Results: Five patients with a median age of 55 years were included in the study. The median APACHE II, SAPS II, and SOFA scores on admission were 13, 37, and 4 respectively. The difference in the mean values of; positive end-expiratory pressure, static compliance, plateau pressure, fractional inspired oxygen, and arterial oxygen tension to fractional inspired oxygen ratio between the time of intubation and the last fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were 4.4 cmH Conclusion: - There was a numerically and clinically significant improvement in lung mechanics and oxygenation leading to a 100% ventilator liberation rate. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage in Coronavirus disease patients can improve lung mechanics, oxygenation, and rates of extubation.

Indexed as

Bronchoalveolar lavageBronchoscopyCOVIDExtubationLung mechanicsOxygenation

Identifiers

PMID35316965
PMCPMC8927051
OpenAlexW4221010386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.