Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35316525›Full record

ReviewPulmonary therapy2022

Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: A Review of Current and Future Application in Lung Transplantation.

Kareem Ahmad, Jennifer L Pluhacek, A Whitney Brown

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pulmonary therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Research advances in consistency and variability inJournal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Human gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Long-term outcomes of lung transplantation withFrontiers in transplantation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kareem AhmadInova Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Inova Fairfax Hospital, 3300 Gallows Road, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Jennifer L PluhacekInova Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Inova Fairfax Hospital, 3300 Gallows Road, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
A Whitney BrownInova Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Inova Fairfax Hospital, 3300 Gallows Road, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA. anne.brown@inova.org.
Inova Fairfax Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of waitlisted lung transplant candidates exceeds the availability of donor organs. Barriers to utilization of donor lungs include suboptimal lung allograft function, long ischemic times due to geographical distance between donor and recipient, and a wide array of other logistical and medical challenges. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a modality that allows donor lungs to be evaluated in a closed circuit outside of the body and extends lung donor assessment prior to final acceptance for transplantation. EVLP was first utilized successfully in 2001 in Lund, Sweden. Since its initial use, EVLP has facilitated hundreds of lung transplants that would not have otherwise happened. EVLP technology continues to evolve and improve, and currently there are multiple commercially available systems, and more under investigation worldwide. Although barriers to universal utilization of EVLP exist, the possibility for more widespread adaptation of this technology abounds. Not only does EVLP have diagnostic capabilities as an organ monitoring device but also the therapeutic potential to improve lung allograft quality when specific issues are encountered. Expanded treatment potential includes the use of immunomodulatory treatment to reduce primary graft dysfunction, as well as targeted antimicrobial therapy to treat infection. In this review, we will highlight the historical development, the current state of utilization/capability, and the future promise of this technology.

Indexed as

Cost-effectivenessDonor lung conditioningDonor lung utilizationEVLPEx vivo lung transplantLung transplant outcomesLung transplant volume

Identifiers

PMID35316525
PMCPMC9098710
OpenAlexW4220964022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.