Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35316501›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

Real-World Treatment Patterns in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Across Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) and Japan.

Andrea Leith, Jeri Kim, Amanda Ribbands, Emily Clayton, Lingfeng Yang, Sameer R Ghate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Final overall survival and safety analyses of the phase III PSMAfore trial of [Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Lancet (London, England) · 2024
    Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Treatment patterns in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who received darolutamide in the ARAMIS trial in Spain: PARASEC study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea LeithAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Jeri KimMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Amanda RibbandsAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Emily ClaytonAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Lingfeng YangMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Sameer R GhateMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Sameer.Ghate@Merck.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProstate cancer (PC) is the second most common cancer, and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related mortality among male patients, worldwide. In Europe and Japan, the incidence of PC in men in 2020 exceeded that of lung cancer. Although national and regional clinical guidelines for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are available in Europe and Japan, a literature review did not identify a published comparison of differing guidelines, but identified a lack of studies reporting treatment patterns of approved mCRPC treatments in Europe and Japan in normal clinical practice. The objective of this real-world study was to compare national treatment guidelines and real-world treatment for mCRPC in Europe and Japan.

methodsPhysician-reported demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment data of patients with mCRPC were drawn from the Adelphi Prostate Cancer Disease Specific Programme™, conducted in five European countries and Japan (2020) and analysed descriptively.

resultsAll current treatment guidelines recommended the use of novel hormonal agents (NHA-abiraterone/enzalutamide) and chemotherapy (mainly docetaxel), with some intercountry differences, with NHA rechallenge accepted in Germany, Italy and Japan, but not in France, Spain or the United Kingdom. Overall, 271 physicians provided data for 1753 patients. At 1st-line (1L), the most common treatment was NHAs followed by (→) chemotherapy, in all countries. Chemotherapy was the most common 2nd-line (2L) treatment, except in Japan, where 2L NHA use was preferred, and Spain, where both were used equally. NHA → chemotherapy and chemotherapy → NHA were the first and second usual 1L → 2L sequence in most countries, except for France, where the second most common sequence was NHA → NHA, and Japan, with androgen deprivation therapy alone → NHA.

conclusionReal-world mCRPC treatment patterns largely reflected national guidelines. It is expected that guidelines and treatment patterns will change with the development of new treatment options.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEuropeFranceHumansJapanMaleNitrilesSpainAndrogen AntagonistsNitrilesChemotherapyDocetaxelMetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerNovel hormonal agentsTreatment guidelinesTreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID35316501
PMCPMC9056448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.