Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35316439›Full record

ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2022

[Palliative care for patients over 80 years old with COVID‑19 pneumonia on the intensive care unit-Is invasive ventilation effective?]

Dagmar Vohla

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dagmar Vohla3. Medizinische Abteilung, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Wien, Österreich. dagmar.vohla@stud.pmu.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8775-4734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In February 2020 a new virus named-SARS-CoV‑2 emerged. As a result many patients suffered from COVID‑19-associated pneumonia and were in need of hospitalization in an intensive care unit (ICU). Especially at the beginning of this pandemic the mortality among intubated patients was very high. With ongoing experience in how to handle COVID‑19-associated respiratory insufficiency the mortality rate was reduced but is still high among older patients. In this case report it is discussed if validated scores can support the decision between intubating patients or providing best supportive care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Noninvasive VentilationRespiratory InsufficiencyAged, 80 and overHumansIntensive Care UnitsPalliative CareRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2Best supportive care scoresCOVID‑19Geriatric intensive careIntubation

Identifiers

PMID35316439
PMCPMC8938651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.