Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35316299›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Knowledge attitudes and practices toward seasonal influenza vaccine among pregnant women during the 2018/2019 influenza season in Tunisia.

Sonia Dhaouadi, Ghassen Kharroubi, Amal Cherif, Ines Cherif, Hind Bouguerra, Leila Bouabid, Nourhene Najar, Adel Gharbi, Afif Ben Salah, Nissaf Bouafif Ép Ben Alaya and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sonia DhaouadiNational Observatory of New and Emerging Diseases, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0002-6676-9045
Ghassen KharroubiLaboratory of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Amal CherifNational Observatory of New and Emerging Diseases, Tunis, Tunisia.
Ines CherifLaboratory of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Hind BouguerraNational Observatory of New and Emerging Diseases, Tunis, Tunisia.
Leila BouabidNational Observatory of New and Emerging Diseases, Tunis, Tunisia.
Nourhene NajarNational Observatory of New and Emerging Diseases, Tunis, Tunisia.
Adel GharbiLaboratory of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Afif Ben SalahLaboratory of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Nissaf Bouafif Ép Ben AlayaNational Observatory of New and Emerging Diseases, Tunis, Tunisia.
Jihene BettaiebLaboratory of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-0056-452X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe uptake and acceptance of the influenza vaccine (IV) among pregnant women remain unknown in Tunisia despite the increased influenza-related complications and death. The present study aimed to assess the IV uptake and acceptability and to describe related knowledge and attitudes among pregnant women in Tunisia.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in 84 Tunisian healthcare facilities over a period of three months (from March to May 2019). All pregnant women aged ≥18 years who sought antenatal care in related health structures were included in this study based on a multistage self-weighted sampling. We measured knowledge and attitudes towards the IV and assessed factors related to willingness for its uptake.

resultsThe questionnaire was completed by 1157 pregnant women. More than half of the participants (60.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] [57.3%-63.0%]) reported awareness about the IV. Among included PW, only 4.6%; 95% CI [3.5%-6.1%] received it during their current pregnancy. However, (36.8%; 95% CI [34.0%-39.6%]) declared their willingness to receive the vaccine in the next pregnancy. Recommendation by healthcare providers, identified to be the most trustful source of information, was the main reason for acceptance. However, the intention to accept the IV by pregnant women was significantly associated with such recommendation and perceived safety and effectiveness of this vaccine.

conclusionAntenatal care visits are a precious opportunity that should not be missed by health care providers and especially gynecologists to promote the IV uptake by pregnant women in Tunisia.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnant PeopleSeasonsTunisiaVaccinationInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35316299
PMCPMC8939791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.