Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35316132›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Linguistic measures of psychological distance track symptom levels and treatment outcomes in a large set of psychotherapy transcripts.

Erik C Nook, Thomas D Hull, Matthew K Nock, Leah H Somerville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. From theDepression and anxiety · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erik C NookDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0001-7967-0792
Thomas D HullResearch and Development, Talkspace, New York, NY 10025.
Matthew K NockDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Leah H SomervilleDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0002-3747-6884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SignificanceUsing language to "distance" ourselves from distressing situations (i.e., by talking less about ourselves and the present moment) can help us manage emotions. Here, we translate this basic research to discover that such "linguistic distancing" is a replicable measure of mental health in a large set of therapy transcripts (

Indexed as

Psychological DistancePsychotherapyEmotionsHumansLinguisticsTreatment Outcomeinternalizing symptomslanguagelinguistic distancepsychotherapytreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35316132
PMCPMC9060508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.