Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35315786›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Optimizing Existing Mental Health Screening Methods in a Dementia Screening and Risk Factor App: Observational Machine Learning Study.

Narayan Kuleindiren, Raphael Paul Rifkin-Zybutz, Monika Johal, Hamzah Selim, Itai Palmon, Aaron Lin, Yizhou Yu, Ali Alim-Marvasti, Mohammad Mahmud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Narayan Kuleindiren *Mindset Technologies Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7576-6954
Raphael Paul Rifkin-Zybutz *Mindset Technologies Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-0847
Monika JohalMindset Technologies Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2205-4005
Hamzah SelimMindset Technologies Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7485-3909
Itai PalmonMindset Technologies Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7402-9189
Aaron LinMindset Technologies Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5096-7573
Yizhou YuMindset Technologies Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4800-9392
Ali Alim-MarvastiMindset Technologies Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7811-0344
Mohammad MahmudMindset Technologies Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-5093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMindstep is an app that aims to improve dementia screening by assessing cognition and risk factors. It considers important clinical risk factors, including prodromal symptoms, mental health disorders, and differential diagnoses of dementia. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire for depression (PHQ-9) and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) are widely validated and commonly used scales used in screening for depression and anxiety disorders, respectively. Shortened versions of both (PHQ-2/GAD-2) have been produced.

objectiveWe sought to develop a method that maintained the brevity of these shorter questionnaires while maintaining the better precision of the original questionnaires.

methodsSingle questions were designed to encompass symptoms covered in the original questionnaires. Answers to these questions were combined with PHQ-2/GAD-2, and anonymized risk factors were collected by Mindset4Dementia from 2235 users. Machine learning models were trained to use these single questions in combination with data already collected by the app: age, response to a joke, and reporting of functional impairment to predict binary and continuous outcomes as measured using PHQ-9/GAD-7. Our model was developed with a training data set by using 10-fold cross-validation and a holdout testing data set and compared to results from using the shorter questionnaires (PHQ-2/GAD-2) alone to benchmark performance.

resultsWe were able to achieve superior performance in predicting PHQ-9/GAD-7 screening cutoffs compared to PHQ-2 (difference in area under the curve 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.08, P=.02) but not GAD-2 (difference in area under the curve 0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.03, P=.42). Regression models were able to accurately predict total questionnaire scores in PHQ-9 (R

conclusionsWe app-adapted PHQ-4 by adding brief summary questions about factors normally covered in the longer questionnaires. We additionally trained machine learning models that used the wide range of additional information already collected in Mindstep to make a short app-based screening tool for affective disorders, which appears to have superior or equivalent performance to well-established methods.

Indexed as

anxietycognitiondementiadepressionmachine learningprecisionpredictionquestionnaireresearch methodrisk factorsscreening

Identifiers

PMID35315786
PMCPMC8984825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.