Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35315599›Full record

ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2022

Complications of Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Safe Procedures for COVID-19 Testing Based on Anatomical Knowledge.

Dai Hyun Kim, Dasom Kim, Jee Won Moon, Sung-Won Chae, Im Joo Rhyu

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Robotic system for nasopharyngeal swab sampling based on remote center of motion mechanism.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dai Hyun KimDepartment of Dermatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-2366
Dasom KimDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7817-3652
Jee Won MoonDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2307-1824
Sung-Won ChaeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medicine, Seoul, Korea. koreachae@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6401-352X
Im Joo RhyuDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-6278
Korea University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1F1A1077244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal swabs have been widely to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing is a generally safe and well-tolerated procedure, but numerous complications have been reported in the media. Therefore, the present study aimed to review and document adverse events and suggest procedural references to minimize preventable but often underestimated risks. A total of 27 articles were selected for the review of 842 related documents in PubMed, Embase, and KoreaMed. The complications related to nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing were reported to be rarely happened, ranging from 0.0012 to 0.026%. Frequently documented adverse events were retained swabs, epistaxis, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, often associated with high-risk factors, including severe septal deviations, pre-existing skull base defects, and previous sinus or transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Appropriate techniques based on sufficient anatomical knowledge are mandatory for clinicians to perform nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing. The nasal floor can be predicted by the line between the nostril and external ear canal. For safe testing, the angle of swab insertion in the nasal passage should remain within 30° of the nasal floor. The swab was gently inserted along the nasal septum just above the nasal floor to the nasopharynx and remained on the nasopharynx for several seconds before removal. Forceful insertion should be attempted, and alternative examinations should be considered, especially in vulnerable patients. In conclusion, patients and clinicians should be aware of rare but possible complications and associated high-risk factors. The suggested procedural pearls enable more comfortable and safe nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing for both clinicians and patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansNasal CavityNasopharynxSARS-CoV-2Specimen HandlingComplicationsCOVID-19 TestingNasopharyngeal SwabProcedural ReferenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35315599
PMCPMC8938608
OpenAlexW4221016998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.