Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35315562›Full record

ReviewEcology letters2022

When are bacteria really gazelles? Comparing patchy ecologies with dimensionless numbers.

Samuel S Urmy, Alli N Cramer, Tanya L Rogers, Jenna Sullivan-Stack, Marian Schmidt, Simon D Stewart, Celia C Symons

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel S UrmyMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2663-6253
Alli N CramerSchool of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0356-5782
Tanya L RogersNOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Santa Cruz, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1253-9903
Jenna Sullivan-StackDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0114-1019
Marian SchmidtDepartment of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2866-4496
Simon D StewartCawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1916-5481
Celia C SymonsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-0327
Cawthron Institute · NZCornell University · USMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute · USNOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center · USOregon State University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USWashington State University · US

Funding

National Science Foundation OCE-1356192National Science Foundation OCE-1935796Simons Foundation 602015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From micro to planetary scales, spatial heterogeneity-patchiness-is ubiquitous in ecosystems, defining the environments in which organisms move and interact. However, most large-scale models still use spatially averaged 'mean fields' to represent natural populations, while fine-scale spatially explicit models are mostly restricted to particular organisms or systems. In a conceptual paper, Grünbaum (2012, Interface Focus 2: 150-155) introduced a heuristic, based on three dimensionless ratios quantifying movement, reproduction and resource consumption, to characterise patchy ecological interactions and identify when mean-field assumptions are justifiable. We calculated these dimensionless numbers for 33 interactions between consumers and their resource patches in terrestrial, aquatic and aerial environments. Consumers ranged in size from bacteria to whales, and patches lasted from minutes to millennia, with separation scales from mm to hundreds of km. No interactions could be accurately represented by naive mean-field models, though 19 (58%) could be partially simplified by averaging out movement, reproductive or consumption dynamics. Clustering interactions by their non-dimensional ratios revealed several unexpected dynamic similarities. For example, bacterial Pseudoalteromonas exploit nutrient plumes similarly to Mongolian gazelles grazing on ephemeral steppe vegetation. We argue that dimensional analysis is valuable for characterising ecological patchiness and can link widely different systems into a single quantitative framework.

Indexed as

AntelopesEcosystemAnimalsBacteriacomparative ecologydimensional analysisinteractionsmodel systemspatchinessscale

Identifiers

PMID35315562
PMCPMC9545138
OpenAlexW4221120610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.