Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35315465›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2022

Feature tracking microfluidic analysis reveals differential roles of viscosity and friction in sickle cell blood.

Hannah M Szafraniec, José M Valdez, Elizabeth Iffrig, Wilbur A Lam, John M Higgins, Philip Pearce, David K Wood

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mathematical modeling of SCD: a literature review.Journal of sickle cell disease · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. High-throughput quantification of red blood cell deformability and oxygen saturation to probe mechanisms of sickle cell disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah M SzafraniecDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. dkwood@umn.edu.
José M ValdezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. dkwood@umn.edu.
Elizabeth IffrigDepartment of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Wilbur A LamAflac Cancer Center and Blood Disorders Service of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0325-7990
John M HigginsCenter for Systems Biology and Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9182-0076
Philip PearceDepartment of Mathematics, University College London, London, UK. philip.pearce@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5788-3826
David K WoodDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. dkwood@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5225-2144
University of Minnesota · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USHarvard University · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Developing a multiscale understanding of biophysical processes in sickle cell diseaseR01HL132906 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WOOD, DAVID KEVIN · 2017 to 2024
$4.6M
Redefining Clinical Viscosity in Sickle Cell Diseaseby Leveraging Microfluidic TechnologiesR01HL140589 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LAM, WILBUR A, WOOD, DAVID KEVIN · 2018 to 2021
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL132906NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL140589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterization of blood flow rheology in hematological disorders is critical for understanding disease pathophysiology. Existing methods to measure blood rheological parameters are limited in their physiological relevance, and there is a need for new tools that focus on the microcirculation and extract properties at finer resolution than overall flow resistance. Herein, we present a method that combines microfluidic systems and powerful object-tracking computational technologies with mathematical modeling to separate the red blood cell flow profile into a bulk component and a wall component. We use this framework to evaluate differential contributions of effective viscosity and wall friction to the overall resistance in blood from patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) under a range of oxygen tensions. Our results demonstrate that blood from patients with SCD exhibits elevated frictional and viscous resistances at all physiologic oxygen tensions. Additionally, the viscous resistance increases more rapidly than the frictional resistance as oxygen tension decreases, which may confound analyses that extract only flow velocities or overall flow resistances. Furthermore, we evaluate the impact of transfusion treatments on the components of the resistance, revealing patient variability in blood properties that may improve our understanding of the heterogeneity of clinical responses to such treatments. Overall, our system provides a new method to analyze patient-specific blood properties and can be applied to a wide range of hematological and vascular disorders.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesFrictionHumansOxygenPlant ExtractsRheologyViscosityOxygenPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID35315465
PMCPMC9004467
OpenAlexW4221051760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.