Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35315395›Full record

SynthesisActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2022

Tocilizumab in addition to standard of care in the management of COVID-19: a meta-analysis of RCTs.

Victor Mutua, Brandon Michael Henry, Chris von Csefalvay, Isaac Cheruiyot, Jens Vikse, Giuseppe Lippi, Brian Bundi, Newnex Mong'are

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Victor MutuaSchool of Medicine. vicmutua3@gmail.com.
Brandon Michael Henry. brandon.henry@cchmc.org.
Chris von Csefalvay. csefalvayk@starschema.net.
Isaac Cheruiyot. isaacbmn@outlook.com.
Jens Vikse. jensvikse@gmail.com.
Giuseppe Lippi. giuseppe.lippi@unvir.it.
Brian Bundi. nyamweya9083@gmail.com.
Newnex Mong'are. newnexmongare@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for exploring clinical benefits and safety of tocilizumab in addition to standard of care (SOC) in treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

methodsAn electronic search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct, as well as in medRxiv preprint server, to identify eligible studies. Only randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compared mortality events and/or adverse events between a tocilizumab + SOC group and a SOC-only control group were included. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include progression to severe disease, defined as need for mechanical ventilation (MV) or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and adverse events (AE).

resultsA total of nine studies (6,490 participants) could be included in this meta-analysis, with 3,358 participants in the tocilizumab + SOC group and 3,132 participants in the SOC-only group. The overall mortality rate was lower in the tocilizumab group compared to the SOC-only group, though the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.04; I2, 15%). This finding was unaffected by subgroup analyses based on initial use of steroids or mechanical ventilation at baseline. Patients receiving tocilizumab were 26% less likely to progress to MV, and this difference was statistically significant (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.86; I2, 0%). Among patients who were not in ICU at randomization, the tocilizumab group had 34 % lower rate of ICU admission compared to the SOC-only group (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40-2.14; I2, 29%). The occurrence of serious infections was lower in the tocilizumab group (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.89; I2, 21%).

conclusionTocilizumab is generally well-tolerated in COVID-19. Although this drug does not appear to have a significant benefits on survival, it may have a role in preventing progression to intensive care and MV.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStandard of CareAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedtocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID35315395
PMCPMC8972884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.