Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35315261›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2022

Early detection to prevent foot ulceration among type 2 diabetes mellitus patient: A multi-intervention review.

I Dewa Ayu Rismayanti, Nursalam Nursalam, Virgianti Nur Farida, Ni Wayan Suniya Dewi, Resti Utami, Arifal Aris, Ni Luh Putu Inca Buntari Agustini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk assessment of amputation in patients with diabetic foot.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I Dewa Ayu RismayantiFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java. Putrariswama097@gmail.com.
Nursalam NursalamFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java. nursalam@fkp.unair.ac.id.
Virgianti Nur FaridaFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java. i.dewa.ayu.rismayanti-2019@fkp.unair.ac.id.
Ni Wayan Suniya DewiFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java. i.dewa.ayu.rismayanti-2019@fkp.unair.ac.id.
Resti UtamiFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java. i.dewa.ayu.rismayanti-2019@fkp.unair.ac.id.
Arifal ArisFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java. i.dewa.ayu.rismayanti-2019@fkp.unair.ac.id.
Ni Luh Putu Inca Buntari AgustiniFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java. i.dewa.ayu.rismayanti-2019@fkp.unair.ac.id.
Airlangga University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot ulceration is one of the biggest complications experienced by type 2 diabetes patients. The severity and prevention of new wounds can be overcome through early detection interventions. This systematic review aims to explain and provide a comparison of various interventions that have been developed to prevent the occurrence of Diabetes Foot Ulcers (DFU). We searched Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL, SAGE, and ProQuest for English, experimental studies, published between 2016-2021 that tested early detection for preventing diabetic foot ulcers in diabetic patients. The Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines were used to assess eligibility, and PRISMA quality and a checklist to guide this review. 25 studies were obtained that matched the specified inclusion criteria. The entire article has an experimental study design. Majority of respondents were type 2 diabetes patients who have not experienced ulceration. Based on the results of the review, there were 3 main types of interventions used in the early detection of DFU. The types of intervention used are 1) conventional intervention/physical assessment, 2) 3D thermal camera assessment system, and 3) DFU screening instrument. The three types of interventions have advantages and disadvantages, so their use needs to be adjusted to the conditions and needs of the patient. the development of DFU risk early detection intervention needs to be developed. Integration with modern technology can also be done to increase the accuracy of the results and the ease of examination procedures.

Identifiers

PMID35315261
PMCPMC8973203
OpenAlexW4220757422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.