Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314945›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2022

Effect of Preserving the Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage Tube Before Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Surgical Outcome: Post Hoc Analysis of the CSGO-HBP-017.

Yoshito Tomimaru, Nariaki Fukuchi, Shigekazu Yokoyama, Takuji Mori, Masahiro Tanemura, Kenji Sakai, Yutaka Takeda, Masanori Tsujie, Terumasa Yamada, Atsushi Miyamoto and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cholecystostomy tube management in acute cholecystitis: a population-based cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshito TomimaruDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Nariaki FukuchiDepartment of Surgery, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Shigekazu YokoyamaDepartment of Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Takuji MoriDepartment of Surgery, Tane General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiro TanemuraDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kenji SakaiDepartment of Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yutaka TakedaDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.
Masanori TsujieDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nara Hospital, Kinki University, Ikoma, Japan.
Terumasa YamadaDepartment of Surgery, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Higashiosaka, Japan.
Atsushi MiyamotoDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuji HashimotoDepartment of Surgery, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan.
Hisanori HatanoDepartment of Surgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Junzo ShimizuDepartment of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.
Keishi SugimotoDepartment of Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Japan.
Masaki KashiwazakiDepartment of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Kenichi MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Shogo KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. skobayashi@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group
Osaka University · JPHyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital · JPKansai Rosai Hospital · JPKindai University · JPMinoh City Hospital · JPMiyoshi Kasei (Japan) · JPNaga Municipal Hospital · JPOsaka Hospital · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPOsaka Police Hospital · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPSuita Municipal Hospital · JPTane General Hospital · JPToyonaka Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) is followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), there is no consensus regarding whether the drainage tube should be preserved or removed before LC. We hypothesized that the surgical results of LC might differ between cases with PTGBD tube preservation versus removal. Here, we investigated how drainage tube preservation or removal affected the surgical outcome of LC.

methodsUsing data from our previous multicenter study, we compared LC outcomes after PTGBD between patients with PTGBD tube preservation versus removal. This study included 208 patients who underwent LC over 12 days after PTGBD. In 83 cases, the PTGBD tube was preserved until LC, and in 125 cases, the tube was removed before LC. The results were verified by propensity score matching with 50 patients in each group.

resultsCases with tube preservation versus removal exhibited significantly longer surgery duration (174 ± 105 min vs 145 ± 61 min, P = .0118) and postoperative hospital stay (14 ± 16 days vs 7 ± 7 days, P < .0001), a significantly higher postoperative complication rate (13.2% vs 3.2%, P = .0061), and a marginally higher incidence of open conversion (12.0% vs 4.8%, P = .0547). Propensity score matching verified the inferior surgical outcomes in cases with tube preservation.

conclusionsThese results imply that when LC is performed > 12 days after PTGBD, the surgical outcome may be inferior when the drainage tube is preserved rather than removed before LC.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteCholecystostomyDrainageGallbladderHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGallbladder drainageLaparoscopic cholecystectomyPreservationRemovalTube

Identifiers

PMID35314945
OpenAlexW4220793542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.