Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314814›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2022

KRAS is vulnerable to reversible switch-II pocket engagement in cells.

James D Vasta, D Matthew Peacock, Qinheng Zheng, Joel A Walker, Ziyang Zhang, Chad A Zimprich, Morgan R Thomas, Michael T Beck, Brock F Binkowski, Cesear R Corona and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Discovery of a novel and potent KRASJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Targeted therapeutic strategies forTranslational lung cancer research · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The AUTACE That Degrades KRAS and Engages CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James D Vasta *Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8511-2113
D Matthew Peacock *Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-5535
Qinheng Zheng *Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8440-8673
Joel A WalkerPromega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Ziyang ZhangDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0541-7211
Chad A ZimprichPromega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Morgan R ThomasPromega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Michael T BeckPromega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Brock F BinkowskiPromega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Cesear R CoronaPromega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Matthew B RobersPromega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA. Matt.Robers@promega.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8505-5227
Kevan M ShokatDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Kevan.Shokat@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8590-7741
Promega (United States) · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms in CancerT32CA108462 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GOGA, ANDREI · 2004 to 2024
$10.4M
Inhibitors of the G protein GNAS which drives pancreatic tumorigenesisR01CA244550 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHOKAT, KEVAN M. · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
A 600 MHz NMR console and cryoprobe for studies of macromolecules, drug discovery and cancer biomarkersS10OD023455 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GROSS, JOHN D · 2018 to 2018
$820k
Targeting the GTP-bound state of oncogenic Ras proteinsF32CA253966 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PEACOCK, DAVID MATTHEW · 2020 to 2021
$134k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS F32 CA253966NCI NIH HHS R01 CA244550NCI NIH HHS T32 CA108462NIH HHS S10 OD023455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current small-molecule inhibitors of KRAS(G12C) bind irreversibly in the switch-II pocket (SII-P), exploiting the strong nucleophilicity of the acquired cysteine as well as the preponderance of the GDP-bound form of this mutant. Nevertheless, many oncogenic KRAS mutants lack these two features, and it remains unknown whether targeting the SII-P is a practical therapeutic approach for KRAS mutants beyond G12C. Here we use NMR spectroscopy and a cellular KRAS engagement assay to address this question by examining a collection of SII-P ligands from the literature and from our own laboratory. We show that the SII-Ps of many KRAS hotspot (G12, G13, Q61) mutants are accessible using noncovalent ligands, and that this accessibility is not necessarily coupled to the GDP state of KRAS. The results we describe here emphasize the SII-P as a privileged drug-binding site on KRAS and unveil new therapeutic opportunities in RAS-driven cancer.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)HumansLigandsMutationKRAS protein, humanLigandsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID35314814
PMCPMC9135634
OpenAlexW4221126430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.