Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314777›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2022

Temporal changes in incidence of relapse and outcome after relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia over three decades; a Nordic population-based cohort study.

Karen Schow Jensen, Trausti Oskarsson, Päivi M Lähteenmäki, Trond Flaegstad, Ólafur Gísli Jónsson, Petter Svenberg, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Mats Heyman, Ulrika Norén-Nyström, Henrik Schrøder and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. [Recent research on chimeric antigen receptor T cells in children with refractory/relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Karen Schow JensenDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0811-8818
Trausti OskarssonDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Päivi M LähteenmäkiChildhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5500-9606
Trond FlaegstadDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Ólafur Gísli JónssonChildren's Hospital, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Petter SvenbergDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kjeld SchmiegelowDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0829-4993
Mats HeymanDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7637-1949
Ulrika Norén-NyströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5606-5442
Henrik Schrøder *Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Birgitte Klug Albertsen *Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. biralber@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3902-3694
Aarhus University Hospital · DKKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SECopenhagen University Hospital · DKNational University Hospital of Iceland · ISUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relapse remains the main obstacle to curing childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The aims of this study were to compare incidence of relapse, prognostic factors, and survival after relapse between three consecutive Nordic Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology trials. Relapse occurred as a primary event in 638 of 4 458 children (1.0-14.9 years) diagnosed with Ph-negative ALL between 1992 and 2018. The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 17.3% (95% CI 15.4-19.2%) and 16.5% (95% CI 14.3-18.8%) for patients in the ALL1992 and ALL2000 trials, respectively, but decreased to 8.4% (95% CI 7.0-10.1%) for patients in the ALL2008 trial. No changes in duration of first complete remission and site of relapse were observed over time; however, high hyperdiploidy, and t(12;21) decreased in the ALL2008 trial. The 4-year overall survival after relapse was 56.6% (95% CI 52.5-60.5%) and no statistically significant temporal improvements were observed. Age ≥10 years, T-cell immunophenotype, bone-marrow involvement, early and very early relapse, hypodiploidy, and Down syndrome all independently predicted worse outcome after relapse. Improvements in the primary treatment of childhood ALL has resulted in fewer relapses. However, failure to improve outcome of remaining relapses suggests a selection of harder-to-cure relapses and calls for new therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaChildCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceInfantRecurrenceRemission InductionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35314777
OpenAlexW4221080345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.