Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314720›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Validation of a CE-IVD, urine exosomal RNA expression assay for risk assessment of prostate cancer prior to biopsy.

Alexander Kretschmer, Holger Kajau, Eric Margolis, Ronald Tutrone, Tobias Grimm, Matthias Trottmann, Christian Stief, Georg Stoll, Christian A Fischer, Claudia Flinspach and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04720599 (Clinical Evaluation of ExoDx™ Prostate), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04720599 completednot on this map

Clinical Evaluation of ExoDx™ Prostate(IntelliScore) in Men Presenting for Initial Prostate Biopsy

TypeobservationalSponsorExosome Diagnostics, Inc.Ran2020 to 2021Enrolled120ConditionsUrologic CancerArmsExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Urinary extracellular vesicle RNAs as novelClinical kidney journal · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Analytical Validation of MyProstateScore 2.0.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Alexander KretschmerLudwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Holger KajauSRH Wald-Klinikum Gera GmbH, Gera, Germany.
Eric MargolisDepartment of Urology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, USA.
Ronald TutroneChesapeake Urology Associates, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tobias GrimmUrologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Kaufbeuren, Kaufbeuren, Germany.
Matthias TrottmannUrologie und Andrologie am Promenadeplatz, Munich, Germany.
Christian StiefLudwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Georg StollExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Christian A FischerExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Claudia FlinspachExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Anja AlbrechtExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Lisa MeyerExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Tina PriewasserExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Daniel EnderleExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Romy MüllerExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Phillipp TorklerExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Jason AlterExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA.
Johan SkogExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA. johan.skog@bio-techne.com.
Mikkel NoerholmExosome Diagnostics, Waltham, MA, USA. mikkel.noerholm@bio-techne.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved risk stratification of patients suspected of prostate cancer prior to biopsy continues to be an unmet clinical need. ExoDx Prostate (IntelliScore) "EPI" is a non-invasive urine test utilizing RNA from exosomes to provide a risk score that correlates with the likelihood of finding high grade prostate cancer at biopsy. Here, we present the results from a prospective clinical validation study of EPI-CE, a CE-marked in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay, specifically developed for use in European clinical laboratories. The study (NCT04720599) enrolled patients with ≥ 50 years, PSA 2-10 ng/mL, prior to MRI, who were scheduled for initial biopsy. First catch urine samples were collected from participants without prior digital rectal examination or prostate massage. Exosomal RNA was isolated and expression levels of three biomarkers ERG, PCA3 and SPDEF were analyzed according to the EPI-CE Instructions For Use. In the study cohort of N = 109 patients, EPI-CE was validated to have a Negative Predictive Value of 89%, a Sensitivity of 92% and a superior performance to two commonly used multiparametric risk calculators (PCPT and ERSPC) in both Receiver Operating Characteristics with a higher Area Under the Curve for EPI-CE 0.67 (95% CI 0.56-0.77) versus PCPT 0.59 (95% CI 0.47-0.71) and ERSPC 0.60 (95% CI 0.49-0.72) and higher Net Benefits analysis across a wide range of risk acceptance levels. This is the first clinical study reporting on the performance of EPI-CE. We demonstrate that EPI-CE provides information beyond standard clinical parameters and provides a better risk assessment prior to MRI, of patients suspected of prostate cancer, than the commonly used multiparametric risk calculators.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRNAProstate-Specific AntigenRNA

Identifiers

PMID35314720
PMCPMC8938406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.