Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314675›Full record

SynthesisBlood cancer journal2022

Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review.

Joan Bladé, Meral Beksac, Jo Caers, Artur Jurczyszyn, Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal, Philippe Moreau, Leo Rasche, Laura Rosiñol, Saad Z Usmani, Elena Zamagni and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Blood cancer journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 198 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
198citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
38.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

198 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 257 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. International Myeloma Society/International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Recommendations on the Definition of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

138 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Joan BladéDepartment of Hematology, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. JBLADE@clinic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4563-3405
Meral BeksacDepartment of Hematology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Jo CaersDepartment of Hematology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3175-1195
Artur JurczyszynPlasma Cell Dyscrasia Center, Department of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9796-8365
Marie von Lilienfeld-ToalKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung für Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9756-3541
Philippe MoreauUniversity Hospital Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
Leo RascheDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9536-9649
Laura RosiñolDepartment of Hematology, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2534-9239
Saad Z UsmaniDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Elena ZamagniIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia 'Seràgnoli' and Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Paul RichardsonJerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-8865
Ankara University · TRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BEConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHarvard University · USHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESIstituto di Ematologia di Bologna · ITJagiellonian University · PLJena University Hospital · DELevine Cancer Institute · USUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extramedullary involvement (or extramedullary disease, EMD) represents an aggressive form of multiple myeloma (MM), characterized by the ability of a clone and/or subclone to thrive and grow independent of the bone marrow microenvironment. Several different definitions of EMD have been used in the published literature. We advocate that true EMD is restricted to soft-tissue plasmacytomas that arise due to hematogenous spread and have no contact with bony structures. Typical sites of EMD vary according to the phase of MM. At diagnosis, EMD is typically found in skin and soft tissues; at relapse, typical sites involved include liver, kidneys, lymph nodes, central nervous system (CNS), breast, pleura, and pericardium. The reported incidence of EMD varies considerably, and differences in diagnostic approach between studies are likely to contribute to this variability. In patients with newly diagnosed MM, the reported incidence ranges from 0.5% to 4.8%, while in relapsed/refractory MM the reported incidence is 3.4 to 14%. Available data demonstrate that the prognosis is poor, and considerably worse than for MM without soft-tissue plasmacytomas. Among patients with plasmacytomas, those with EMD have poorer outcomes than those with paraskeletal involvement. CNS involvement is rare, but prognosis is even more dismal than for EMD in other locations, particularly if there is leptomeningeal involvement. Available data on treatment outcomes for EMD are derived almost entirely from retrospective studies. Some agents and combinations have shown a degree of efficacy but, as would be expected, this is less than in MM patients with no extramedullary involvement. The paucity of prospective studies makes it difficult to justify strong recommendations for any treatment approach. Prospective data from patients with clearly defined EMD are important for the optimal evaluation of treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaPlasmacytomaHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35314675
PMCPMC8938478
OpenAlexW4220896277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.