Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314634›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Final Report on Clinical Outcomes and Tumor Recurrence Patterns of a Pilot Study Assessing Efficacy of Belinostat (PXD-101) with Chemoradiation for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

Karen Xu, Karthik Ramesh, Vicki Huang, Saumya S Gurbani, James Scott Cordova, Eduard Schreibmann, Brent D Weinberg, Soma Sengupta, Alfredo D Voloschin, Matthias Holdhoff and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Karthik RameshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Vicki HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3029-4700
Saumya S GurbaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3524-3726
James Scott CordovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Eduard SchreibmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Brent D WeinbergDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7992-1747
Soma SenguptaDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4577-1397
Alfredo D VoloschinDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Matthias HoldhoffDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Peter B BarkerDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Lawrence R KleinbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Jeffrey J OlsonWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Hui-Kuo G ShuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Hyunsuk ShimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008169 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, ROBERT E · 1987 to 2021
$20.3M
Quantitative MRSI to predict early response to SAHA therapy in new GBM managementU01CA172027 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BARKER, PETER B, HU, XIAOPING P · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
Improved Whole-Brain Spectroscopic MRI for Radiation Treatment PlanningU01EB028145 · NIBIB · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, LEE, HAN, HUI · 2018 to 2020
$2.4M
Automated imaging analysis tools to guide clinical decision making in brain tumor patientsF31CA247564 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI RAMESH, KARTHIK · 2020 to 2024
$235k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA247564NCI NIH HHS U01 CA172027NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB028145NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is highly aggressive and has a poor prognosis. Belinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with blood-brain barrier permeability, anti-GBM activity, and the potential to enhance chemoradiation. The purpose of this clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of combining belinostat with standard-of-care therapy. Thirteen patients were enrolled in each of control and belinostat cohorts. The belinostat cohort was given a belinostat regimen (500-750 mg/m

Indexed as

GlioblastomaHumansHydroxamic AcidsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPilot ProjectsSulfonamidesbelinostatHydroxamic AcidsSulfonamidesepigenetic drugglioblastomahistone deacetylasemagnetic resonance spectroscopyradiation sensitizer

Identifiers

PMID35314634
PMCPMC8938806
OpenAlexW4220955586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.