Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314624›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Finite Element Modeling of Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis of the Surgical Margin of Breast Tumor.

Koushik Paul, Samuel Razmi, Barbara A Pockaj, Leila Ladani, Jeremy Stromer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Koushik PaulSchool for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-4898
Samuel RazmiEnMed Department, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77807, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1873-098X
Barbara A PockajMayo Clinic in Arizona, Surgery, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Leila LadaniSchool for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5715-9851
Jeremy StromerSurvivability Engineering Branch, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS 39180, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound is commonly used as an imaging tool in the medical sector. Compared to standard ultrasound imaging, quantitative ultrasound analysis can provide more details about a material microstructure. In this study, quantitative ultrasound analysis was conducted through computational modeling to detect various breast duct pathologies in the surgical margin tissue. Both pulse-echo and pitch-catch methods were evaluated for a high-frequency (22-41 MHz) ultrasound analysis. The computational surgical margin modeling was based on various conditions of breast ducts, such as normal duct, ductal hyperplasia, DCIS, and calcification. In each model, ultrasound pressure magnitude variation in the frequency spectrum was analyzed through peak density and mean-peak-to-valley distance (MPVD) values. Furthermore, the spectral patterns of all the margin models were compared to extract more pathology-based information. For the pitch-catch mode, only peak density provided a trend in relation to different duct pathologies. For the pulse-echo mode, only the MPVD was able to do that. From the spectral comparison, it was found that overall pressure magnitude, spectral variation, peak pressure magnitude, and corresponding frequency level provided helpful information to differentiate various pathologies in the surgical margin.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMargins of ExcisionBreastFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansUltrasonographybreast cancerductal carcinoma in situfinite element analysispeak densitypitch-catchpulse-echoquantitative ultrasoundsurgical margin

Identifiers

PMID35314624
PMCPMC8938815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.