Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314612›Full record

ArticleAudiology research2022

The Effect of the Use of Hearing Aids in Elders: Perspectives.

Daniele Monzani, Riccardo Nocini, Maria Teresa Presutti, Chiara Gherpelli, Federica Di Berardino, Silvia Ferrari, Gian Maria Galeazzi, Gaia Federici, Elisabetta Genovese, Silvia Palma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Audiology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of hearing aid usage on the quality of life of the older adult in KwaZulu-Natal.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniele MonzaniSection of Otolaryngology and Audiology, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy.
Riccardo NociniDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, University Hospital of Verona, Borgo Trento, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy.
Maria Teresa PresuttiSection of Otolaryngology and Audiology, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy.
Chiara GherpelliSection of Otolaryngology and Audiology, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy.
Federica Di BerardinoAudiology Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20021 Milan, Italy.
Silvia FerrariSection of Psychiatry, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7929-4520
Gian Maria GaleazziSection of Psychiatry, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2706-3362
Gaia FedericiSection of Otolaryngology and Audiology, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4938-8555
Elisabetta GenoveseSection of Otolaryngology and Audiology, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy.
Silvia PalmaAudiology, Primary Care Department, AUSL Modena, 41100 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5521-4343
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults with hearing loss have difficulties during conversation with others because an elevated auditory threshold reduces speech intelligibility, especially in noisy environments. Listening and comprehension often become exhausting tasks for hearing-impaired elders, resulting in social isolation and depression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the advantages of hearing aid use in relation to relief from listening-related fatigue, which is still controversial. Participants included a sample of 49 hearing-impaired elders affected by presbycusis for whom hearing aids were prescribed. The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale was used to assess cognitive, physical and psychosocial fatigue. The vitality subscale of the Short Form Health Survey 36 and a single item of the multi-dimensional Speech, Spatial and Quality Hearing Scale ("Do you have to put a lot of effort to hear what is being said in conversation with others?") were also used. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire was used to investigate daily errors related to lack of memory and reduced mindedness. Hearing aids rehabilitation resulted in improved speech intelligibility in competing noise, and a significant reduction in cognitive and psychosocial fatigue and listening effort in conversation. Vitality was also improved and a significant reduction in the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire scores was observed. Findings from the study indicate that the use of hearing aids in older impaired-listeners provide them not only with an increased auditory function but also with a reduction in listening-related fatigue and mindedness.

Indexed as

cognitive failuresfatiguehearing aidpresbycusis

Identifiers

PMID35314612
PMCPMC8938775
OpenAlexW4220866273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.