Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314608›Full record

ArticleAudiology research2022

Spatial Release from Masking for Tones and Noises in a Soundfield under Conditions Where Targets and Maskers Are Stationary or Moving.

M Torben Pastore, William A Yost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Audiology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Torben PastoreCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3994-4434
William A YostCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.

Funding

Dynamic Sound Source LocalizationR01DC015214 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI YOST, WILLIAM ALBERT · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
CSRD VA 1NIH HHS F32DC016808NIH HHS R01DC015214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stationary visual targets often become far more salient when they move against an otherwise static background-the so-called "pop out" effect. In two experiments conducted over loudspeakers, we tested for a similar pop-out effect in the auditory domain. Tone-in-noise and noise-in-noise detection thresholds were measured using a 2-up, 1-down adaptive procedure under conditions where target and masker(s) were presented from the same or different locations and when the target was stationary or moved via amplitude-panning. In the first experiment, target tones of 0.5 kHz and 4 kHz were tested, maskers (2-4, depending on the condition) were independent Gaussian noises, and all stimuli were 500-ms duration. In the second experiment, a single pink noise masker (0.3-12 kHz) was presented with a single target at one of four bandwidths (0.3-0.6 kHz, 3-6 kHz, 6-12 kHz, 0.3-12 kHz) under conditions where target and masker were presented from the same or different locations and where the target moved or not. The results of both experiments failed to show a decrease in detection thresholds resulting from movement of the target.

Indexed as

spatial hearingspatial release from masking

Identifiers

PMID35314608
PMCPMC8938785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.