Observational studyNeurology2022
Simplified Edinburgh CT Criteria for Identification of Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.
Observational study in Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03183167 (Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Cohort of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Cohort of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A plasma protein signature for cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- Functional outcome, five-year survival and burden of disease after size- and location-matched hemorrhagic versus ischemic stroke.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Island Sign on Computed Tomography Is Associated With Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Sex differences in imaging features including cerebral amyloid angiopathy markers in intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in stroke · 2026Article
- Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction, Edema Formation and Functional Recovery in Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Retrospective Study.Neurology international · 2025Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Aβ Biomarkers Predict Recurrent Hemorrhage and Identify Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy in Patients With Lobar Hemorrhage.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Clinical Management of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Imaging Interstitial Fluids and Extracellular Matrix in Cerebrovascular Disorders: Current Perspectives and Clinical Applications.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Association ofStroke and vascular neurology · 2025Article
- The probability of cerebral amyloid angiopathy according to the Simplified Edinburgh CT criteria in a large, unselected lobar intracerebral hemorrhage population.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage and finger-like projection predict recurrence in patients with lobar intracerebral hemorrhage.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Benefits of early MR-Imaging in patients with acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective study.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Fluid biomarkers in cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Clinical considerations in early-onset cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Applicability of the Edinburgh CT Criteria for Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Intracerebral haemorrhage.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and the Risk of Hematoma Expansion.Annals of neurology · 2022Article
- Simplified Edinburgh and modified Boston criteria in relation to amyloid PET for lobar intracerebral hemorrhage.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesIn patients with lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), etiologic characterization represents a tradeoff between feasibility, resource allocation, and diagnostic certainty. This study investigated the accuracy and clinical utility of the simplified Edinburgh CT criteria to identify underlying cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA).
methodsThis external validation analyzed 210 consecutive patients with lobar ICH and available CT and MRI studies from a prospective single-center observational cohort study (2006-2015, Longitudinal Cohort Study on ICH Care [UKER-ICH,] NCT03183167). We investigated the interrater variability and diagnostic accuracy of the simplified Edinburgh CT-based criteria for identification of ICH associated with probable CAA according to MRI-based modified Boston criteria as a reference standard. We evaluated the utility of the simplified Edinburgh criteria by decision curve analysis, comparing the theoretical clinical net benefit (weighted benefit-harm at varying threshold probabilities) of the high-risk category (finger-like projections and subarachnoid hemorrhage) for ruling in and the low-risk category (neither finger-like projections nor subarachnoid hemorrhage) for ruling out with the assumptions of no or all patients having CAA (default strategies).
resultsOf 210 patients, 70 (33.3%) had high risk, 67 (31.9%) had medium risk, and 73 (34.8%) had low risk for CAA-associated ICH according to simplified Edinburgh CT criteria, showing moderate interrater variability. Discrimination was good (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.74, 95% CI 0.67-0.81) without evidence of poor calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow, DISCUSSION: Applying the simplified Edinburgh CT criteria during diagnostic workup seems clinically useful and may accurately identify CAA in patients with lobar ICH. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03183167. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with lobar hemorrhages, the simplified Edinburgh criteria accurately identify those at high risk of CAA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.