Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314483›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

Adolescent experiences of mistreatment during childbirth in health facilities: secondary analysis of a community-based survey in four countries.

Theresa Azonima Irinyenikan, Adeniyi Kolade Aderoba, Olufunmilayo Fawole, Olusoji Adeyanju, Hedieh Mehrtash, Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh, Thae Maung Maung, Mamadou Dioulde Balde, Joshua P Vogel, Marina Plesons and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spatial disparities and determinants of obstetric fistula among childbearing women in sub-Saharan Africa: A geospatial regression approach.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Theresa Azonima IrinyenikanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Ondo State, Nigeria tirinyenikan2017@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5594-037X
Adeniyi Kolade AderobaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mother and Child Hospital, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-4333-9093
Olufunmilayo FawoleDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Olusoji AdeyanjuAdeoyo Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Hedieh MehrtashDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4991-616X
Kwame Adu-BonsaffohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana.
Thae Maung MaungDepartment of Medical Research, Yangon, Myanmar.ORCID 0000-0002-1265-3813
Mamadou Dioulde BaldeCellulle de Recherche en Sante de la Reproduction en Guinee (CERREGUI), Conakry, Guinea.
Joshua P VogelMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marina PlesonsDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3224-618X
Venkatraman Chandra-MouliDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Özge TunçalpDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-682X
Meghan A BohrenGender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4179-4682

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPregnancy and childbearing among adolescents-especially younger adolescents-is associated with health complications and lost opportunities for education and personal development. In addition to established challenges adolescents and young women face in sexual and reproductive healthcare, evidence suggests that they also face mistreatment during childbirth.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of the WHO study 'How women are treated during facility-based childbirth' cross-sectional community survey in Ghana, Guinea, Myanmar and Nigeria. We used descriptive analysis to assess experiences of mistreatment among adolescents (15-19 years) and young women (20-24 years) and multivariable logistic regression models to assess the association between experiences of mistreatment and satisfaction with care during childbirth.

results862 participants are included (15-19 years: 287, 33.3%; 20-24 years: 575, 66.7%). The most common mistreatment was verbal abuse (15-19 years: 104/287, 36.2%; 20-24 years: 181/575, 31.5%). There were high levels of poor communication (15-19 years: 92/287, 32.1%; 20-24 years: 171/575, 29.7%), lack of supportive care (15-19 years: 22/287, 42.5%; 20-24 years: 195/575, 33.9%) and lack of privacy (15-19 years: 180/287, 62.7%; 20-24 years: 395/575, 68.7%). Women who were verbally abused were less likely to report satisfaction with care (adjusted OR (AOR): 0.19, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.31) and less likely to recommend the facility (AOR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.38). There were similar reports among those who were physically abused, had long waiting time, did not mobilise and did not give consent for vaginal examinations.

conclusionOur study shows that adolescents and young women mistreatment during childbirth, contributing to low satisfaction with care. It is critical to recognise adolescents and young women's unique needs in maternal healthcare and how their needs may intersect with social stigma around sex and pregnancy.

Indexed as

ParturitionQuality of Health CareAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansPregnancySurveys and Questionnairescommunity-based surveyepidemiologyhealth services researchmaternal healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID35314483
PMCPMC10175942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.