Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314477›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Development of the Homeless Health Access to Care Tool to identify health-related vulnerability among people experiencing homelessness: Delphi study, Australia.

Jane Currie, Elizabeth Grech, Erin Longbottom, Jasmine Yee, Ruth Hastings, Amy Aitkenhead, Matthew Larkin, Lee Jones, Amy Cason, Karin Obrecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimising Access to Healthcare for Patients Experiencing Homelessness in Hospital Emergency Departments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Heat Illness Requiring Emergency Care for People Experiencing Homelessness: A Case Study Series.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Multistage Psychometric Testing of the Homeless Health Access to Care Tool.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jane CurrieSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia jane.currie@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8721-089X
Elizabeth GrechHomeless Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Erin LongbottomHomeless Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Jasmine YeeHomeless Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Ruth HastingsHomeless Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Amy AitkenheadHomeless Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Matthew LarkinHomeless Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Lee JonesSchool of Public Health and Social Work and Center for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Amy CasonHomeless Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Karin ObrechtHomeless Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this paper, we report the development of the Homeless Health Access to Care Tool. This tool aims to improve the gap in assessing health need and capacity to access healthcare of people experiencing homelessness. Tools exist that prioritise people experiencing homelessness for housing, but none specifically designed to prioritise for healthcare, or that are succinct enough to be easily implemented to emergency department or primary healthcare settings. DESIGN AND

settingThe Homeless Health Access to Care Tool has been adapted from an existing tool, the Vulnerability Index Service Prioritisation Decision Assistance Tool through a five-step process: (1) domain identification, (2) literature review, (3) analysis of hospital admission data, (4) expert judges, and (5) Delphi study.

participantsThe tool was adapted and developed by homeless health clinicians, academics and people with lived experience of homelessness. The Delphi study (n=9) comprised emergency department and homeless health clinicians.

resultsConsensus was gained on all but one item, five new items were added, and wording changes were made to six items based on expert feedback. Participants perceived the tool would take between 5 to 11 min to complete, the number of items were appropriate, and the majority agreed it would facilitate the assessment of health needs and capacity to access healthcare.

conclusionRobust development of the Homeless Health Access to Care Tool through the Delphi is the first phase of its development. The Homeless Health Access to Care Tool offers an opportunity to assess both health need and capacity to access healthcare with the aim to improve access to healthcare for people experiencing homelessness. This tool will facilitate standardised data collection to inform service design and data linkage regarding access to healthcare of people experiencing homelessness. The next stages of testing include construct validity, feasibility, usability and inter-rater reliability, and pilot implementation.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsAustraliaDelphi TechniqueHealth Services AccessibilityHumansReproducibility of Resultsaccident & emergency medicineprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID35314477
PMCPMC8938696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.