Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314433›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Unique characteristics of tertiary lymphoid structures in kidney clear cell carcinoma: prognostic outcome and comparison with bladder cancer.

Tsukasa Masuda, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Kimiharu Takamatsu, Kyohei Hakozaki, Ryohei Takahashi, Tadatsugu Anno, Ryohei Kufukihara, Kazunori Shojo, Shuji Mikami, Toshiaki Shinojima and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tsukasa MasudaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyuki TanakaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan urotanaka@keio.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-0841-9167
Kimiharu TakamatsuDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyohei HakozakiDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryohei TakahashiDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadatsugu AnnoDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryohei KufukiharaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazunori ShojoDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuji MikamiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiaki ShinojimaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro KakimiDepartment of Immuno-therapeutics, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2631-3040
Tatsuhiko TsunodaDepartment of Medical Science Mathematics, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Eriko AimonoGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi NishiharaGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryuichi MizunoDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Mototsugu OyaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPKeio University Hospital · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of this study were (1) to clarify the impact of tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) status on the outcome and immunogenomic profile of human clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and (2) to determine phenotypic differences in TLSs between different types of genitourinary cancer, that is, urinary ccRCC and bladder cancer.

methodsWe performed a quantitative immunohistological analysis of ccRCC tissue microarrays and conducted integrated genome mutation analysis by next-generation sequencing and methylation array analysis. Since the tumor immune microenvironment of ccRCC often differs from that of other cancer types, we analyzed the phenotypic differences in TLSs between ccRCC and in-house bladder cancer specimens.

resultsVarying distribution patterns of TLSs were observed throughout ccRCC tumors, revealing that the presence of TLSs was related to poor prognosis. An analysis of genomic alterations based on TLS status in ccRCC revealed that alterations in the PI3K-mTOR pathway were highly prevalent in TLS-positive tumors. DNA methylation profiling also revealed distinct differences in methylation signatures among ccRCC samples with different TLS statuses. However, the TLS characteristics of ccRCC and bladder cancer markedly differed: TLSs had the exact opposite prognostic impact on bladder cancer as on ccRCC. The maturity and spatial distribution of TLSs were significantly different between the two cancer types; TLSs were more mature with follicle-like germinal center organization and likely to be observed inside the tumor in bladder cancer. Labeling for CD8, FOXP3, PD-1, and PD-L1 showed marked differences in the diversity of the immune microenvironment surrounding TLSs. The proportions of CD8-, FOXP3-, and PD-L1-positive cells were significantly higher in TLSs in bladder cancer than in TLSs in ccRCC; rather the proportion of PD-1-positive cells was significantly higher in TLSs in ccRCC than in TLSs in bladder cancer.

conclusionThe immunobiology of ccRCC is unique, and various cancerous phenomena conflict with that seen in other cancer types; therefore, comparing the TLS characteristics between ccRCC and bladder cancer may help reveal differences in the prognostic impact, maturity and spatial distribution of TLSs and in the immune environment surrounding TLSs between the two cancers.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsTertiary Lymphoid StructuresUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansKidneyPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTumor MicroenvironmentB7-H1 AntigenForkhead Transcription FactorsProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptorimmunohistochemistrykidney neoplasmslymphocytes, tumor-infiltratingtumor microenvironmenturinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35314433
PMCPMC8938705
OpenAlexW4221135307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.