SynthesisWorld neurosurgery2022
Systematic Review of Epigenetic Therapies for Treatment of IDH-mutant Glioma.
Synthesis in World neurosurgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- NFS1 Regulates IDH2 to Attenuate Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms via Interacting With SP2.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Identification of targetable epigenetic vulnerabilities for uveal melanoma.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Methylation-induced suppression of YAP/TAZ confers sensitivity to HDAC inhibitors in high-grade IDH mutant gliomas.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Analysis of the Expression Patterns of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Signaling Pathways and Regulatory MicroRNAs in Astrocytic Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- PET imaging of gliomas: Status quo and quo vadis?Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Targeting Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) in Solid Tumors: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2024Review
- Gene expression profiling and the isocitrate dehydrogenase mutational landscape of temozolomide‑resistant glioblastoma.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Metabolomic and Lipidomic Profiling of Gliomas-A New Direction in Personalized Therapies.Cancers · 2022Review
- Identification of VASH1 as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker of Lower-Grade Glioma by Quantitative Proteomics and Experimental Verification.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Ivosidenib for the treatment of IDH1-mutant glioma, grades 2-4: Tolerability, predictors of response, and outcomes.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations in gliomas: A review of current understanding and trials.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIsocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are present in 70% of World Health Organization grade II and III gliomas. IDH mutation induces accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate. Therefore, therapies targeting reversal of epigenetic dysregulation in gliomas have been suggested. However, the utility of epigenetic treatments in gliomas remains unclear. Here, we present the first clinical systematic review of epigenetic therapies in treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas and highlight their safety and efficacy.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from 2000 to January 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened to include clinical usage of epigenetic therapies in case reports, prospective case series, or clinical trials. Primary and secondary outcomes included safety/tolerability of epigenetic therapies and progression-free survival/overall survival, respectively.
resultsA total of 133 patients across 8 clinical studies were included in our analysis. IDH inhibitors appear to have the best safety profile, with an overall grade 3/grade 4 adverse event rate of 9%. Response rates to IDH-mutant inhibitors were highest in nonenhancing gliomas (stable disease achieved in 55% of patients). In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors demonstrate a lower safety profile with single-study adverse events as high as 28%.
conclusionIDH inhibitors appear promising given their benign toxicity profile and ease of monitoring. Histone deacetylase inhibitors appear to have a narrow therapeutic index, as lower concentrations do not appear effective, while increased doses can produce severe immunosuppressive effects. Preliminary data suggest that epigenetic therapies are generally well tolerated and may control disease in certain patient groups, such as those with nonenhancing lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.