Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314191›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of ophthalmology2022

Cultivated Autologous Limbal Epithelial Cell Transplantation: New Frontier in the Treatment of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.

Ula Jurkunas, Lynette Johns, Myriam Armant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Multiple Stem/Progenitor Cells Isolated from the Limbus.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ula JurkunasFrom the Schepens Eye Research Institute (U.J., L.J.), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: ula_jurkunas@meei.harvard.edu.
Lynette JohnsFrom the Schepens Eye Research Institute (U.J., L.J.), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Myriam ArmantTransLab (M.A.), Translational Research Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Safety and Feasibility of Cultivated Autologous Limbal Epithelial Cell (CALEC) Transplantation in the Treatment of Limbal Stem Cell DeficiencyUG1EY026508 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI JURKUNAS, ULA V. · 2017 to 2020
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY026508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTaking into consideration prior human experience with treating limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) with cultivated limbal epithelial cells (CLEC) from other countries, we have set a goal to optimize and standardize the techniques of CLEC preparation (called CALEC by our group) for the clinical trial in the United States.

methodsWe performed an extensive literature review of all human trials, case series, and reports involving autologous cultivated limbal epithelial cell transplantation. Allogeneic cultivated limbal epithelial cell transplantations were reported only when combined with autologous studies. We also searched prior animal data aiding in detailing regulatory toxicology requirements.

resultsBetween 1997 and 2020, the analysis of human trials revealed 21 studies on autologous grafts, and 13 studies analyzing both autologous grafts and allogeneic grafts. Of a total of 34 studies, 6 studies used good manufacturing process (GMP) facilities, and 11 studies had no animal-derived products or murine feeder layers, whereas only 1 study had both. Overall, the treatment with autologous CLEC grafts was 68.9% successful. In total there were 6 preclinical studies using rabbits, serving as surrogate studies to assess the safety and toxicity of cultivated limbal epithelial cells for human trials. Based on prior human experience, we further optimized the manufacturing conditions with GMP-grade and serum and animal-free reagents, and developed cell characterization assays for the CALEC product release.

conclusionsThese data were used to develop a novel and consistent manufacturing process using only qualified and validated reagents for performing the first clinical trial on CALEC transplantation to treat LSCD in the United States.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesEpithelium, CornealLimbus CorneaeScleral DiseasesAnimalsCells, CulturedCell TransplantationEpithelial CellsHumansMiceRabbitsStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID35314191
PMCPMC9638843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.