Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35313936›Full record

Trial reportTrials2022

Minimal effective dose of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block to reduce oral analgesic requirement after ambulatory laparoscopic tubal resection: a randomized controlled superiority trial.

Sirikarn Siripruekpong, Jinsupha Aphinyankul, Thavat Chanchayanon, Maliwan Oofuvong, Jatupon Pakpirom, Chainarong Choksuchat, Patrapon Packawatchai, Jumras Na Klongdee

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sirikarn SiripruekpongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Jinsupha AphinyankulDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Thavat ChanchayanonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Maliwan OofuvongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand. oomaliwa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5840-5965
Jatupon PakpiromDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Chainarong ChoksuchatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Patrapon PackawatchaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Jumras Na KlongdeeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Prince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University 58155081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effective dose during ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (URSB) for reducing pain after laparoscopic tubal ligation is reported to be 100 mg of 0.25% bupivacaine. We examined the minimal effective dose of 0.25% bupivacaine for URSB on oral analgesic requirement after ambulatory single-port laparoscopic tubal resection.

methodsA prospective, randomized controlled, superiority trial was conducted among patients who had been scheduled for ambulatory laparoscopic tubal resection between September 2015 and January 2019 at a tertiary care hospital in southern Thailand. Anesthesia was induced following protocol. The intervention group was allocated to receive a bilateral URSB using 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on either side after intubation (total 50 mg) while the control group did not receive the sham block. Patients and assessors were blinded to the study intervention. All patients received a multimodal analgesia regimen as follows: fentanyl and ketorolac intraoperatively and fentanyl and oral acetaminophen at the post-anesthetic care unit. Postoperative oral analgesic requirement (acetaminophen and/or ibuprofen) at home was the primary outcome. Postoperative time to first analgesic requirement, oral analgesia (acetaminophen/ibuprofen), and pain score at 6 and 24 h were accessed via telephone interviews. Percentage, effect size (ES), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were presented.

resultsA total of 66 out of 79 eligible patients were analyzed (32 intervention, 34 control). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the intervention group (ES [95% CI]: 0.58 [0.08, 1.07] mcg, p = 0.022). Time to first oral analgesia in the intervention group was significantly longer than that of the control group (ES [95% CI]: 0.66 [0.14, 1.16] h, p = 0.012). The proportion of oral analgesia requirement at 24 h after surgery in the control group was significantly higher than that in the intervention group (97% vs 75%, p = 0.012). Pain scores at 6 and 24 h were similar in both groups although slightly lower in the intervention group (ES [95% CI]: 0.22 [-0.26, 0.71], p = 0.368 and 0.33 [-0.16, 0.81], p = 0.184, respectively).

conclusionA dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 50 mg for URSB reduced the oral analgesic requirement at 24 h and prolonged the time to first analgesic requirement after ambulatory laparoscopic tubal resection.

trial registrationThaiclinicaltrials.org TCTR20150921002 . Registered on 18 September 2015.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPostoperative PainAnalgesicsFemaleHumansProspective StudiesUltrasonography, InterventionalAnalgesicsAmbulatory surgeryLaparoscopic tubal resectionOral analgesic requirementPain scoreRectus sheath blockTime to first oral analgesia

Identifiers

PMID35313936
PMCPMC8935718
OpenAlexW4220902126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.