ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2022
Electrical stimulation to promote osseointegration of bone anchoring implants: a topical review.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxidized-Lipid Signaling and Ferroptosis as Downstream Mechanisms of Titanium-Associated Peri-Implant Bone Loss.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Millimeter-Scale Implantable Magneto-Mechano-Electric Transducer Based on BTO Piezoelectric Ceramics for Remote Wireless Electrical Stimulation of Injured Sciatic Nerves.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Research Progress and Translational Perspectives of Piezoelectric Materials in Dental Implant Surface Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Parameter-resolved AC electrical stimulation links electrical system characteristics to early transcriptional responses in human stem cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Advances in applications of low-dimensional piezoelectric materials in musculoskeletal system.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Enhancing Bone Health with Conjugated Linoleic Acid: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Innovative Strategies.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Safety and preliminary efficacy of an electrically stimulated implant for mandibular bone regeneration: a pilot study in a large animal model.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Electrically Active Biomaterials for Stimulation and Regeneration in Tissue Engineering.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2025Review
- Bone morphogenetic protein-2 and pulsed electrical stimulation synergistically promoted osteogenic differentiation on MC-3T3-E1 cells.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2024Article
- Bioelectronic Direct Current Stimulation at the Transition Between Reversible and Irreversible Charge Transfer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Electrical pulse stimulation parameters modulate N2a neuronal differentiation.Cell death discovery · 2024Article
- Active osseointegration in anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Effects of electrical stimulation with alternating fields on the osseointegration of titanium implants in the rabbit tibia - a pilot study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Effect of Er:YAG Pulsed Laser-Deposited Hydroxyapatite Film on Titanium Implants on M2 Macrophage Polarization In Vitro and Osteogenesis In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Discrimination between the effects of pulsed electrical stimulation and electrochemically conditioned medium on human osteoblasts.Journal of biological engineering · 2023Article
- Novel Electroactive Mineralized Polyacrylonitrile/PEDOT:PSS Electrospun Nanofibers for Bone Repair Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Bio-Piezoelectric Ceramic Composites for Electroactive Implants-Biological Performance.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- DC electrical stimulation enhances proliferation and differentiation on N2a and MC3T3 cell lines.Journal of biological engineering · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical stimulation has shown to be a promising approach for promoting osseointegration in bone anchoring implants, where osseointegration defines the biological bonding between the implant surface and bone tissue. Bone-anchored implants are used in the rehabilitation of hearing and limb loss, and extensively in edentulous patients. Inadequate osseointegration is one of the major factors of implant failure that could be prevented by accelerating or enhancing the osseointegration process by artificial means. In this article, we reviewed the efforts to enhance the biofunctionality at the bone-implant interface with electrical stimulation using the implant as an electrode. We reviewed articles describing different electrode configurations, power sources, and waveform-dependent stimulation parameters tested in various in vitro and in vivo models. In total 55 English-language and peer-reviewed publications were identified until April 2020 using PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Chalmers University of Technology Library discovery system using the keywords: osseointegration, electrical stimulation, direct current and titanium implant. Thirteen of those publications were within the scope of this review. We reviewed and compared studies from the last 45 years and found nonuniform protocols with disparities in cell type and animal model, implant location, experimental timeline, implant material, evaluation assays, and type of electrical stimulation. The reporting of stimulation parameters was also found to be inconsistent and incomplete throughout the literature. Studies using in vitro models showed that osteoblasts were sensitive to the magnitude of the electric field and duration of exposure, and such variables similarly affected bone quantity around implants in in vivo investigations. Most studies showed benefits of electrical stimulation in the underlying processes leading to osseointegration, and therefore we found the idea of promoting osseointegration by using electric fields to be supported by the available evidence. However, such an effect has not been demonstrated conclusively nor optimally in humans. We found that optimal stimulation parameters have not been thoroughly investigated and this remains an important step towards the clinical translation of this concept. In addition, there is a need for reporting standards to enable meta-analysis for evidence-based treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.