ArticleBMC oral health2022
The validity of self-reported number of teeth and edentulousness among Norwegian older adults, the HUNT Study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dental health service utilization among older adults receiving home care services in south-eastern Norway.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Oral Health-Head and Neck Cancers: Addressing Confounding Through Negative Control and Quantitative Bias Analyses.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026Article
- Estimating the Causal Effect of Tooth Loss on the Critical Outcome of COVID-19.JDR clinical and translational research · 2026Article
- The Effect of Tooth Loss on Depression and Anxiety Among Older Adults in China: The Mediating Role of Dietary Diversity.Nutrients · 2026Article
- A novel nutritional index and risk of edentulism: evidence from cross-sectional, prospective, and trajectory analyses.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Factors associated with socioeconomic inequalities in the use of dental services among Brazilian older adults: an Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Self-reported oral health and oral health-related quality of life among older adults receiving home care services in South-eastern Norway.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Long-Term Oral Health Effects of Traumatic Events Among World Trade Center Health Registry Enrolees, 2003-2020.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025Article
- Who requires dental treatment under general anesthesia due to pain and severe dental anxiety? Findings from panoramic X-ray images and anamnesis.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Oral Health Differences Between Middle-Aged and Older Adults in South Korea.International dental journal · 2025Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study of Peri-Implant Diseases in a Random Norwegian Population: Prevalence, Risk Indicators, and Clinical Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Validity of the self-reported number of teeth in independent older people in Japan.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Development of a nomogram for identifying periodontitis cases in Denmark.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Association between tea types and number of teeth: a cross-sectional study of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Validity of self-reported number of teeth among Saudi older adults: A public health perspective.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2024Article
- Association of health behaviors, dietary habits, and oral health with weight gain after 20 years of age in community-dwelling Japanese individuals aged 40 years and older: a cross-sectional study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Development and Initial Validation of the Oral Health Activities Questionnaire.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumber of teeth is an established indicator of oral health and is commonly self-reported in epidemiological studies due to the costly and labor-intensive nature of clinical examinations. Although previous studies have found self-reported number of teeth to be a reasonably accurate measure, its accuracy among older adults ≥ 70 years is less explored. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of self-reported number of teeth and edentulousness in older adults and to investigate factors that may affect the accuracy of self-reports.
methodsThis study included two different samples of older adults ≥ 70 years drawn from the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study (the HUNT Study), Norway. Sample 1 (n = 586) was used to evaluate the validity of self-reported number of teeth and sample 2 (n = 518) was used to evaluate self-reported edentulousness. Information on number of teeth and background variables (education, smoking, cognitive function, and self-perceived general and oral health) were self-reported in questionnaires, while clinical oral health examinations assessed number of teeth, number of teeth restored or replaced by fixed prosthodontics and edentulousness. Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plot, chi-square test and kappa statistics were used to assess the agreement between self-reported and clinically recorded number of teeth.
resultsThe mean difference between self-reported and clinically recorded number of teeth was low (- 0.22 teeth), and more than 70% of the participants reported their number of teeth within an error of two teeth. Correlations between self-reports and clinical examinations were high for the total sample (0.86 (Spearman) and 0.91 (Pearson)). However, a lower correlation was found among participants with dementia (0.74 (Spearman) and 0.85 (Pearson)), participants having ≥ 20 teeth (0.76 (Spearman) and 0.67 (Pearson)), and participants with ≥ 5 teeth restored or replaced by fixed prosthodontics (0.75 (Spearman) and 0.77 (Pearson)). Self-reports of having teeth or being edentulous were correct in 96.3% of the cases (kappa value 0.93, p value < 0.001).
conclusionsAmong older Norwegian adults, self-reported number of teeth agreed closely with clinical tooth counts and nearly all the edentulous participants correctly reported having no teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.