Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35313875›Full record

SynthesisRespiratory research2022

Spirometry parameters used to define small airways obstruction in population-based studies: systematic review.

Ben Knox-Brown, Octavia Mulhern, Johanna Feary, Andre F S Amaral

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. New spirometry recommendations from the Brazilian Thoracic Association - 2024 update.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Small airways dysfunction: associated factors, clinical aspects and new perspectives.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence and Environmental Correlates of Small Airways Dysfunction in a Rural Swiss Cohort.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reduced FEVInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Article
  16. The Impact of Age and Disease Entity on Small Airway Dysfunction in Obstructive Airway Diseases.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ben Knox-BrownNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, 1B Manresa Road, London, SW3 6LR, UK. b.knox-brown20@imperial.ac.uk.
Octavia MulhernNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, 1B Manresa Road, London, SW3 6LR, UK.
Johanna FearyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, 1B Manresa Road, London, SW3 6LR, UK.
Andre F S AmaralNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, 1B Manresa Road, London, SW3 6LR, UK.

Funding

National Heart and Lung Institute WHRG - F26289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of small airways obstruction (SAO) using spirometry is practiced in population-based studies. However, it is not clear what are the most used parameters and cut-offs to define abnormal results.

methodsWe searched three databases (Medline, Web of Science, Google Scholar) for population-based studies, published by 1 May 2021, that used spirometry parameters to identify SAO and/or provided criteria for defining SAO. We systematically reviewed these studies and summarised evidence to determine the most widely used spirometry parameter and criteria for defining SAO. In addition, we extracted prevalence estimates and identified associated risk factors. To estimate a pooled prevalence of SAO, we conducted a meta-analysis and explored heterogeneity across studies using meta regression.

resultsTwenty-five studies used spirometry to identify SAO. The most widely utilised parameter (15 studies) was FEF

conclusionThere is a lack of consensus regarding the best spirometry parameter or defining criteria for identification of SAO. The value of continuing to measure SAO using spirometry is unclear without further research using large longitudinal data. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021250206.

Indexed as

SpirometryAirway ObstructionHumansRespiratory Function TestsRisk FactorsGlobalPhysiologyPrevalenceRespiratory epidemiologySmall airways obstructionSpirometry

Identifiers

PMID35313875
PMCPMC8939095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.